public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mancha <mancha1@zoho.com>
To: tytso@mit.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
	dborkman@redhat.com
Subject: [BUG/PATCH] kernel RNG and its secrets
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 09:53:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150318095345.GA12923@zoho.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1341 bytes --]

Hi.

The kernel RNG introduced memzero_explicit in d4c5efdb9777 to protect
memory cleansing against things like dead store optimization:

   void memzero_explicit(void *s, size_t count)
   {
           memset(s, 0, count);
           OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(s);
   }

OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR, introduced in fe8c8a126806 to protect crypto_memneq
against timing analysis, is defined when using gcc as:

   #define OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(var) __asm__ ("" : "=r" (var) : "0" (var))

My tests with gcc 4.8.2 on x86 find it insufficient to prevent gcc from
optimizing out memset (i.e. secrets remain in memory).

Two things that do work:

   __asm__ __volatile__ ("" : "=r" (var) : "0" (var))

   and

   __asm__ __volatile__("": : :"memory")

The first is OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR plus a volatile qualifier and the second
is barrier() [as defined when using gcc].

I propose memzero_explicit use barrier().

--- a/lib/string.c
+++ b/lib/string.c
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(memset);
 void memzero_explicit(void *s, size_t count)
 {
        memset(s, 0, count);
-       OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(s);
+       barrier();
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(memzero_explicit);
 
For any attribution deemed necessary, please use "mancha security".
Please CC me on replies.

--mancha

PS CC'ing Herbert Xu in case this impacts crypto_memneq.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2015-03-18 10:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-18  9:53 mancha [this message]
2015-03-18 10:30 ` [BUG/PATCH] kernel RNG and its secrets Daniel Borkmann
2015-03-18 10:50 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-03-18 10:56   ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-03-18 11:09     ` Stephan Mueller
2015-03-18 12:02       ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-03-18 12:14         ` Stephan Mueller
2015-03-18 12:19           ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-03-18 12:20             ` Stephan Mueller
2015-03-18 12:42               ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-03-18 15:09                 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-03-18 16:02                   ` Stephan Mueller
2015-03-18 17:14                     ` mancha
2015-03-18 17:49                       ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-03-18 19:09                         ` mancha
2015-03-18 23:53                       ` Cesar Eduardo Barros
2015-03-18 17:41                   ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-03-18 17:56                     ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-03-18 17:58                       ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-03-18 12:58         ` mancha
2015-04-10 13:25       ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-10 14:00         ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-04-10 14:09           ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-10 14:22             ` mancha security
2015-04-10 14:33               ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-10 20:09                 ` mancha security
2015-04-10 14:26             ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-04-10 14:36               ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-10 14:45                 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2015-04-10 14:46                 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-04-10 14:50                   ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-10 14:54                     ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-04-27 19:10                     ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-27 20:34                       ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-04-27 20:41                         ` Stephan Mueller
2015-04-27 20:53                           ` Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150318095345.GA12923@zoho.com \
    --to=mancha1@zoho.com \
    --cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox