From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755974AbbCRSOT (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2015 14:14:19 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f52.google.com ([209.85.215.52]:33069 "EHLO mail-la0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755648AbbCRSNJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2015 14:13:09 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 21:13:06 +0300 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Andrey Wagin , Andy Lutomirski , Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen , "H. Peter Anvin" , Al Viro , X86 ML , LKML , Linus Torvalds , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Pavel Emelyanov Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86_64,signal: Fix SS handling for signals delivered to 64-bit programs Message-ID: <20150318181306.GF2255@moon> References: <405594361340a2ec32f8e2b115c142df0e180d8e.1426193719.git.luto@kernel.org> <20150318174843.GA32238@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150318174843.GA32238@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 06:48:43PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > On 03/18, Andrey Wagin wrote: > > > > This commit breaks CRIU. I don't have any details yet. I'm going to > > investigate this issue and provide more details tomorrow. > > > > [root@avagin-fc19-cr criu]# setsid sleep 1000 & > > [1] 1225 > > [root@avagin-fc19-cr criu]# ps -C sleep > > PID TTY TIME CMD > > 1226 ? 00:00:00 sleep > > [root@avagin-fc19-cr criu]# ./criu dump -t 1226 -D dump --shell-job > > [root@avagin-fc19-cr criu]# ./criu restore -D dump --shell-job > > Error (parasite-syscall.c:923): Task is in unexpected state: b7f (SIGSEGV) > > This is funny. Because currenty I am looking into criu sources for quite > different reason (and I HATE this reason ;) > > Shot in a dark afer a quick grep: restore_gpregs() should initialize ->ss? It hasn't been needed earlier, if this would help it means abi is broken, no? :) Otherwise I don't understand what's happening. > perhaps something like below... obviously uncompiled/untested. > > And my grep can't find the definition of UserX86RegsEntry in crtools... > Perhaps the change below needs CPREG1(ss, anothername). > > Seriously, where is UserX86RegsEntry? It's in protobif/core-x86.proto, welcome to protobuf hell. > > Oleg. > > > --- a/arch/x86/crtools.c > +++ b/arch/x86/crtools.c > @@ -475,6 +475,7 @@ int restore_gpregs(struct rt_sigframe *f, UserX86RegsEntry *r) > CPREG2(rip, ip); > CPREG2(eflags, flags); > CPREG1(cs); > + CPREG1(ss); > CPREG1(gs); > CPREG1(fs); > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/restorer.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/restorer.h > index 70199fb..c04fb94 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/restorer.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/restorer.h > @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ struct rt_sigcontext { > unsigned short cs; > unsigned short gs; > unsigned short fs; > - unsigned short __pad0; > + unsigned short ss; > unsigned long err; > unsigned long trapno; > unsigned long oldmask; > Cyrill