public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, gong.chen@linux.intel.com,
	bhelgaas@google.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jingle.chen@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace, RAS: remove unnecessary const
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:33:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150319103330.GC11544@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426755004-28434-1-git-send-email-xiexiuqi@huawei.com>

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 04:50:04PM +0800, Xie XiuQi wrote:
> These parameters are passed by value. There's no need to make them const.

I can think of a reason:

include/trace/../../include/ras/ras_event.h: In function ‘ftrace_raw_event_mc_event’:
include/trace/../../include/ras/ras_event.h:136:35: error: assignment of read-only parameter ‘top_layer’
   __entry->top_layer  = top_layer = 12;
                                   ^
---
diff --git a/include/ras/ras_event.h b/include/ras/ras_event.h
index 79abb9c71772..e4721eac3e25 100644
--- a/include/ras/ras_event.h
+++ b/include/ras/ras_event.h
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mc_event,
                __assign_str(label, label);
                __entry->error_count            = error_count;
                __entry->mc_index               = mc_index;
-               __entry->top_layer              = top_layer;
+               __entry->top_layer              = top_layer = 12;
                __entry->middle_layer           = mid_layer;
                __entry->lower_layer            = low_layer;
                __entry->address                = address;
---

I'm not saying it is a particularly sane reason and no one would even
*think* of changing TP parameters passed on from higher layers in the TP
itself but I've seen people do lotsa crazy things - things they normally
would never do - so if it doesn't hurt having the const here, what's the
downside of having the compiler do that sanity checking for us too?

Steve, this is an invitation for your crazy fantasy! :-P

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-19 10:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-19  8:50 [PATCH] trace, RAS: remove unnecessary const Xie XiuQi
2015-03-19 10:33 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2015-03-19 11:57   ` Xie XiuQi
2015-03-19 13:00     ` Steven Rostedt
2015-03-20  4:05       ` Xie XiuQi
2015-03-19 12:57   ` Steven Rostedt
2015-03-19 13:10     ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150319103330.GC11544@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jingle.chen@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox