From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, gong.chen@linux.intel.com,
bhelgaas@google.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jingle.chen@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace, RAS: remove unnecessary const
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:33:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150319103330.GC11544@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426755004-28434-1-git-send-email-xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 04:50:04PM +0800, Xie XiuQi wrote:
> These parameters are passed by value. There's no need to make them const.
I can think of a reason:
include/trace/../../include/ras/ras_event.h: In function ‘ftrace_raw_event_mc_event’:
include/trace/../../include/ras/ras_event.h:136:35: error: assignment of read-only parameter ‘top_layer’
__entry->top_layer = top_layer = 12;
^
---
diff --git a/include/ras/ras_event.h b/include/ras/ras_event.h
index 79abb9c71772..e4721eac3e25 100644
--- a/include/ras/ras_event.h
+++ b/include/ras/ras_event.h
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(mc_event,
__assign_str(label, label);
__entry->error_count = error_count;
__entry->mc_index = mc_index;
- __entry->top_layer = top_layer;
+ __entry->top_layer = top_layer = 12;
__entry->middle_layer = mid_layer;
__entry->lower_layer = low_layer;
__entry->address = address;
---
I'm not saying it is a particularly sane reason and no one would even
*think* of changing TP parameters passed on from higher layers in the TP
itself but I've seen people do lotsa crazy things - things they normally
would never do - so if it doesn't hurt having the const here, what's the
downside of having the compiler do that sanity checking for us too?
Steve, this is an invitation for your crazy fantasy! :-P
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-19 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-19 8:50 [PATCH] trace, RAS: remove unnecessary const Xie XiuQi
2015-03-19 10:33 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2015-03-19 11:57 ` Xie XiuQi
2015-03-19 13:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-03-20 4:05 ` Xie XiuQi
2015-03-19 12:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-03-19 13:10 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150319103330.GC11544@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jingle.chen@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox