From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752824AbbCVKTn (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Mar 2015 06:19:43 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:35907 "EHLO mail-wi0-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752122AbbCVKTh (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Mar 2015 06:19:37 -0400 Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 11:19:33 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa , Corey Ashford , David Ahern , Namhyung Kim , Paul Mackerras , Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/31] perf build: Rename PERF-FEATURES into FEATURE-DUMP Message-ID: <20150322101932.GA2255@gmail.com> References: <1426784707-19466-1-git-send-email-acme@kernel.org> <1426784707-19466-15-git-send-email-acme@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1426784707-19466-15-git-send-email-acme@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > From: Jiri Olsa > > Preparing for feature checks separation, moving related stuff under > 'FEATURE*' namespace. > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa > Cc: Corey Ashford > Cc: David Ahern > Cc: Namhyung Kim > Cc: Paul Mackerras > Cc: Peter Zijlstra > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-v9oo22ra70rrk1dy495a7bjc@git.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo So I think the various capital letter files in $(cwd) are highly suboptimal: FEATURE-DUMP PERF-CFLAGS PERF-VERSION-FILE I think we should standardize on something less pushy (no shouting), plus more standardized, more logical, more coherent names, i.e. something like: .build.features.cache .build.cflags .build.version ? .build.features.* would be reserved to the generic feature detection machinery. .build.cflags and .build.version could be used by the perf build - hopefully exported to tools/build/ as well in the future! :-) That way the .gitignore could just ignore .build.* and we'd not have to update it much. Btw., another small nit: could we please do a (git-)rename of tools/build/feature/ to tools/build/features/? Plural is what is used typically for generic frameworks that deal with a set of items (features in this case) - for example we have tools/tests/, and tools/perf/scripts/, not tools/test/ and tools/perf/script/. Thanks, Ingo