From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: execve and sigreturn syscalls must return via iret
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 08:56:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150323075637.GA25620@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426978461-32089-1-git-send-email-brgerst@gmail.com>
* Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> wrote:
> Both the execve and sigreturn family of syscalls have the ability to change
> registers in ways that may not be compatabile with the syscall path they
> were called from. In particular, sysret and sysexit can't handle non-default
> %cs and %ss, and some bits in eflags. These syscalls have stubs that are
> hardcoded to jump to the iret path, and not return to the original syscall
> path. Commit 76f5df43cab5e765c0bd42289103e8f625813ae1 (Always allocate a
> complete "struct pt_regs" on the kernel stack) recently changed this for
> some 32-bit compat syscalls, but introduced a bug where execve from a 32-bit
> program to a 64-bit program would fail because it still returned via sysretl.
> This caused Wine to fail when built for both 32-bit and 64-bit.
>
> This patch sets TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME for execve and sigreturn so that the iret
> path is always taken on exit to userspace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/ia32/ia32_signal.c | 2 ++
> arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h | 2 +-
> arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h | 7 +++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 6 +-----
> arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 1 +
> arch/x86/kernel/signal.c | 2 ++
> 6 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Applied the fix to tip:x86/asm, thanks Brian!
> +
> +/*
> + * force syscall return via iret by making it look as if there was
> + * some work pending.
> +*/
> +#define force_iret() set_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME)
I extended this comment to:
/*
* Force syscall return via IRET by making it look as if there was
* some work pending. IRET is our most capable (but slowest) syscall
* return path, which is able to restore modified SS, CS and certain
* EFLAGS values that other (fast) syscall return instructions
* are not able to restore properly.
*/
#define force_iret() set_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME)
Just to preserve the underlying reason for force_iret() for the future
and such.
Btw., it might be a worthwile optimization to detect non-standard SS,
CS and EFLAGS values and only force_iret() in that case, that will
speed up 99.9999% of execve() and sigreturn() syscalls and only force
the 'weird' process startup modes into the slow return path.
>From an access security POV it should be a relatively safe
optimization: if we get it wrong then we don't allow certain ABI
angles, but we won't make the kernel unsafe AFAICS.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-23 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-21 22:54 [PATCH] x86: execve and sigreturn syscalls must return via iret Brian Gerst
2015-03-23 7:56 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-03-23 15:24 ` Brian Gerst
2015-03-23 18:42 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-23 12:19 ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry: Fix execve() and sigreturn() syscalls to always return via IRET tip-bot for Brian Gerst
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150323075637.GA25620@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox