From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf record: Allow poll timeout to be specified
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:11:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150325091147.GA1565@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150324212120.GA12599@kernel.org>
* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote:
> Em Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 05:12:11PM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> > * David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Record currently wakes up based on watermarks to read events
> > > from the mmaps and write them out to the file. The result is a
> > > file that can have large blocks of events per mmap before a
> > > finished round event is added to the stream. This in turn
> > > affects the quantity of events that have to be passed through
> > > the ordered events queue before results can be displayed to the
> > > user. For commands like perf-script this can lead to long
> > > unnecessarily long delays before a user gets output. Large
> > > systems (e.g, 1024 cpus) further compound this effect. I have
> > > seen instances where I have to wait 45 minutes for perf-script
> > > to process a 5GB file before any events are shown.
> > >
> > > This patch adds an option to perf-record to allow a user to
> > > specify the poll timeout in msec. For example using 100 msec
> > > timeouts similar to perf-top means the mmaps are traversed much
> > > more frequently leading to a smoother analysis side.
> >
> > Please tune the default value (perhaps influenced by N_PROC?) so
> > that users will get sane behavior without having to specify this
> > option!
>
> Isn't this a followup patch? [...]
Will a followup patch be written?
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-25 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-24 16:09 [PATCH] perf record: Allow poll timeout to be specified David Ahern
2015-03-24 16:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-24 16:18 ` David Ahern
2015-03-24 21:21 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-25 9:11 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-03-25 12:14 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-25 14:41 ` David Ahern
2015-03-25 18:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-25 12:38 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-03-25 14:37 ` David Ahern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150325091147.GA1565@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=david.ahern@oracle.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox