public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf record: Allow poll timeout to be specified
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 10:11:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150325091147.GA1565@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150324212120.GA12599@kernel.org>


* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> wrote:

> Em Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 05:12:11PM +0100, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> > * David Ahern <david.ahern@oracle.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Record currently wakes up based on watermarks to read events 
> > > from the mmaps and write them out to the file. The result is a 
> > > file that can have large blocks of events per mmap before a 
> > > finished round event is added to the stream.  This in turn 
> > > affects the quantity of events that have to be passed through 
> > > the ordered events queue before results can be displayed to the 
> > > user. For commands like perf-script this can lead to long 
> > > unnecessarily long delays before a user gets output. Large 
> > > systems (e.g, 1024 cpus) further compound this effect. I have 
> > > seen instances where I have to wait 45 minutes for perf-script 
> > > to process a 5GB file before any events are shown.
> > > 
> > > This patch adds an option to perf-record to allow a user to 
> > > specify the poll timeout in msec. For example using 100 msec 
> > > timeouts similar to perf-top means the mmaps are traversed much 
> > > more frequently leading to a smoother analysis side.
> > 
> > Please tune the default value (perhaps influenced by N_PROC?) so 
> > that users will get sane behavior without having to specify this 
> > option!
> 
> Isn't this a followup patch? [...]

Will a followup patch be written?

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-25  9:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-24 16:09 [PATCH] perf record: Allow poll timeout to be specified David Ahern
2015-03-24 16:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-24 16:18   ` David Ahern
2015-03-24 21:21   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-25  9:11     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-03-25 12:14       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-03-25 14:41         ` David Ahern
2015-03-25 18:20           ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-25 12:38 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-03-25 14:37   ` David Ahern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150325091147.GA1565@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=david.ahern@oracle.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox