From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/17] x86, fpu: wrap get_xsave_addr() to make it safer
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:56:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150325125613.GB17191@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <551208F8.1090806@redhat.com>
On 03/24, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> On 03/24/2015 08:18 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Is there any reason not to rename __save_init_fpu to
> save_fpu_state, or just save_fpu?
Please see another email. __save_init_fpu() saves the FPU state
but it can also change the FPU registers. At least I think so ;)
Otherwise, why switch_fpu_prepare() resets .last_cpu if it returns
zero? And unlazy_fpu() should do the same.
This all needs the cleanups, yes.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-25 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1427235664-25318-1-git-send-email-dave.hansen@intel.com>
[not found] ` <1427235664-25318-2-git-send-email-dave.hansen@intel.com>
2015-03-24 22:28 ` [PATCH 01/17] x86, fpu: wrap get_xsave_addr() to make it safer Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-24 23:42 ` Dave Hansen
2015-03-24 23:52 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-25 0:12 ` Dave Hansen
2015-03-25 0:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-25 0:20 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-25 1:01 ` Rik van Riel
2015-03-25 9:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-25 14:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-03-25 12:56 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2015-03-25 12:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-03-25 14:28 ` Dave Hansen
2015-03-25 17:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-03-26 18:33 [PATCH 00/17] x86, mpx updates for 4.1 (take 2) Dave Hansen
2015-03-26 18:33 ` [PATCH 01/17] x86, fpu: wrap get_xsave_addr() to make it safer Dave Hansen
2015-03-27 15:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-03-27 16:35 ` Dave Hansen
2015-03-27 18:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-03-27 21:52 [PATCH 00/17] x86, mpx updates for 4.1 (take 3) Dave Hansen
2015-03-27 21:52 ` [PATCH 01/17] x86, fpu: wrap get_xsave_addr() to make it safer Dave Hansen
2015-04-22 18:27 [PATCH 00/17] x86, mpx updates for 4.2 (take 5) Dave Hansen
2015-04-22 18:27 ` [PATCH 01/17] x86, fpu: wrap get_xsave_addr() to make it safer Dave Hansen
2015-04-25 9:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-05-05 17:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-05-08 17:42 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150325125613.GB17191@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=sbsiddha@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox