From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753487AbbCYRda (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:33:30 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:40293 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751278AbbCYRd3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:33:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:33:09 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Vincent Guittot Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel , Preeti U Murthy , Morten Rasmussen , Kamalesh Babulal , Rik van Riel , Mike Galbraith , Nicolas Pitre , Dietmar Eggemann , Linaro Kernel Mailman List , Paul Turner , Ben Segall Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 04/11] sched: Make sched entity usage tracking scale-invariant Message-ID: <20150325173309.GS21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1425052454-25797-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <1425052454-25797-5-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <20150323131905.GF23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:00:57AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote: > On 23 March 2015 at 14:19, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 04:54:07PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > > >> + unsigned long scale_freq = arch_scale_freq_capacity(NULL, cpu); > > > >> + sa->running_avg_sum += delta_w * scale_freq > >> + >> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT; > > > > so the only thing that could be improved is somehow making this > > multiplication go away when the arch doesn't implement the function. > > > > But I'm not sure how to do that without #ifdef. > > > > Maybe a little something like so then... that should make the compiler > > get rid of those multiplications unless the arch needs them. > > yes, it removes useless multiplication when not used by an arch. > It also adds a constraint on the arch side which have to define > arch_scale_freq_capacity like below: > > #define arch_scale_freq_capacity xxx_arch_scale_freq_capacity > with xxx_arch_scale_freq_capacity an architecture specific function Yeah, but it not being weak should make that a compile time warn/fail, which should be pretty easy to deal with. > If it sounds acceptable i can update the patch with your proposal ? I'll stick it to the end, I just wanted to float to patch to see if people had better solutions.