From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932379AbbCYRoc (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:44:32 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:51019 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752941AbbCYRoa (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2015 13:44:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:42:44 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Will Deacon Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, grant.likely@linaro.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, al.stone@linaro.org, graeme.gregory@linaro.org, msalter@redhat.com Subject: Re: Request for additional arm64 branch in linux-next Message-ID: <20150325174244.GA3318@pd.tnic> References: <20150325172002.GN24636@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150325172002.GN24636@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 05:20:03PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > We've got a series of patches introducing ACPI support for arm64 that Oh dear ARM comrades-in-arms, I was hearing rumours and was secretly hoping that you would stay sane and not do the colossal mistake x86 did. My condolences. Perhaps not all is lost after all... -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. --