public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
	Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/asm/entry/64: do not TRACE_IRQS fast SYSRET64 path
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 19:38:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150325183842.GA9302@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427307629-10024-2-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com>


* Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> wrote:

> SYSRET code path has a small irq-off block.
> On this code path, TRACE_IRQS_ON can't be called right before interrupts
> are enabled for real, we can't clobber registers there.
> So current code does it earlier, in a safe place.
> 
> But with this, TRACE_IRQS_OFF/ON frames just two fast instructions,
> which is ridiculous: now most of irq-off block is _outside_ of the framing.
> 
> Do the same thing that we do on SYSCALL entry: do not track this irq-off block,
> it is very small to ever cause noticeable irq latency.
> 
> Be careful: make sure that "jnz int_ret_from_sys_call_irqs_off" now does
> invoke TRACE_IRQS_OFF - move int_ret_from_sys_call_irqs_off label before
> TRACE_IRQS_OFF.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
> CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
> CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
> CC: Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
> CC: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> CC: x86@kernel.org
> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> 
> Changes in v2: added comment
> 
>  arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 13 +++++++------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> index 9c8661c..658cf2e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> @@ -269,8 +269,11 @@ system_call_fastpath:
>   * Has incompletely filled pt_regs.
>   */
>  	LOCKDEP_SYS_EXIT
> +	/*
> +	 * We do not frame this tiny irq-off block with TRACE_IRQS_OFF/ON,
> +	 * it is too small to ever cause noticeable irq latency.

         * ... but if we enter the slowpath from here, we'll execute a 
         * proper TRACE_IRQS_OFF call.

> @@ -298,6 +298,7 @@ system_call_fastpath:
>  	 * 64bit SYSRET restores rip from rcx,
>  	 * rflags from r11 (but RF and VM bits are forced to 0),
>  	 * cs and ss are loaded from MSRs.
> +	 * Restoration of rflags re-enables interrupts.
>  	 */
>  	USERGS_SYSRET64

Is that true even if user-space disabled irqs (via CLI) and executed a 
syscall while having irqs off?

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-25 18:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-25 18:20 [PATCH 1/2 v2] x86/asm/entry/64: better label name, fix comments Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-25 18:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/asm/entry/64: do not TRACE_IRQS fast SYSRET64 path Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-25 18:38   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-03-25 19:15     ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-26 11:45 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] x86/asm/entry/64: better label name, fix comments Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150325183842.GA9302@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox