public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the access_once tree
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 17:45:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150326164537.GI24151@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150326164441.GH24151@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 05:44:42PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 05:36:47PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Can't we make an argument that these barrier calls are not required? The
> > memcpy() call already guarantees we emit the loads and its opaque so the
> > compiler cannot 'cache' the value. So I see not immediate reason for the
> > dual memory clobber.
> 
> Oh wait, it needs to reassess the content of the target variable after
> the memcpy of course.
> 
> Could we then at least make the 64bit case unconditional as well?

Like so.

---
 include/linux/compiler.h | 16 ----------------
 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
index 1b45e4a0519b..0e41ca0e5927 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
@@ -192,29 +192,16 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_branch_data *f, int val, int expect);
 
 #include <uapi/linux/types.h>
 
-static __always_inline void data_access_exceeds_word_size(void)
-#ifdef __compiletime_warning
-__compiletime_warning("data access exceeds word size and won't be atomic")
-#endif
-;
-
-static __always_inline void data_access_exceeds_word_size(void)
-{
-}
-
 static __always_inline void __read_once_size(const volatile void *p, void *res, int size)
 {
 	switch (size) {
 	case 1: *(__u8 *)res = *(volatile __u8 *)p; break;
 	case 2: *(__u16 *)res = *(volatile __u16 *)p; break;
 	case 4: *(__u32 *)res = *(volatile __u32 *)p; break;
-#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
 	case 8: *(__u64 *)res = *(volatile __u64 *)p; break;
-#endif
 	default:
 		barrier();
 		__builtin_memcpy((void *)res, (const void *)p, size);
-		data_access_exceeds_word_size();
 		barrier();
 	}
 }
@@ -225,13 +212,10 @@ static __always_inline void __write_once_size(volatile void *p, void *res, int s
 	case 1: *(volatile __u8 *)p = *(__u8 *)res; break;
 	case 2: *(volatile __u16 *)p = *(__u16 *)res; break;
 	case 4: *(volatile __u32 *)p = *(__u32 *)res; break;
-#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
 	case 8: *(volatile __u64 *)p = *(__u64 *)res; break;
-#endif
 	default:
 		barrier();
 		__builtin_memcpy((void *)p, (const void *)res, size);
-		data_access_exceeds_word_size();
 		barrier();
 	}
 }

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-26 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-26  8:31 linux-next: build warnings after merge of the access_once tree Stephen Rothwell
2015-03-26 10:11 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-26 10:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-26 13:27   ` Will Deacon
2015-03-26 14:22     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-26 14:41       ` Will Deacon
2015-03-26 14:51         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-26 15:08           ` Will Deacon
2015-03-26 16:15       ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-26 16:21         ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-26 16:36           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-26 16:44             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-26 16:45               ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
     [not found]             ` <CA+55aFw1WHJqSj+z-mJGY-kxrg_OsGp9jK9VBi+wB4zPgCkv_w@mail.gmail.com>
2015-03-26 17:07               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-26 17:17                 ` Will Deacon
2015-03-26 17:23                 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-26 19:42                   ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-26 16:28         ` Peter Zijlstra
     [not found]           ` <CA+55aFzUPPSHakwbp-Y-SaXB+o1=V6rOknz7L3AYNXNPU1MSfg@mail.gmail.com>
2015-03-26 17:12             ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-26 17:24         ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-26 17:52           ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-26 18:54             ` Christian Borntraeger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150326164537.GI24151@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox