From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-next@vger.kernel.org" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the access_once tree
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 17:45:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150326164537.GI24151@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150326164441.GH24151@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 05:44:42PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 05:36:47PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Can't we make an argument that these barrier calls are not required? The
> > memcpy() call already guarantees we emit the loads and its opaque so the
> > compiler cannot 'cache' the value. So I see not immediate reason for the
> > dual memory clobber.
>
> Oh wait, it needs to reassess the content of the target variable after
> the memcpy of course.
>
> Could we then at least make the 64bit case unconditional as well?
Like so.
---
include/linux/compiler.h | 16 ----------------
1 file changed, 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
index 1b45e4a0519b..0e41ca0e5927 100644
--- a/include/linux/compiler.h
+++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
@@ -192,29 +192,16 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_branch_data *f, int val, int expect);
#include <uapi/linux/types.h>
-static __always_inline void data_access_exceeds_word_size(void)
-#ifdef __compiletime_warning
-__compiletime_warning("data access exceeds word size and won't be atomic")
-#endif
-;
-
-static __always_inline void data_access_exceeds_word_size(void)
-{
-}
-
static __always_inline void __read_once_size(const volatile void *p, void *res, int size)
{
switch (size) {
case 1: *(__u8 *)res = *(volatile __u8 *)p; break;
case 2: *(__u16 *)res = *(volatile __u16 *)p; break;
case 4: *(__u32 *)res = *(volatile __u32 *)p; break;
-#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
case 8: *(__u64 *)res = *(volatile __u64 *)p; break;
-#endif
default:
barrier();
__builtin_memcpy((void *)res, (const void *)p, size);
- data_access_exceeds_word_size();
barrier();
}
}
@@ -225,13 +212,10 @@ static __always_inline void __write_once_size(volatile void *p, void *res, int s
case 1: *(volatile __u8 *)p = *(__u8 *)res; break;
case 2: *(volatile __u16 *)p = *(__u16 *)res; break;
case 4: *(volatile __u32 *)p = *(__u32 *)res; break;
-#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
case 8: *(volatile __u64 *)p = *(__u64 *)res; break;
-#endif
default:
barrier();
__builtin_memcpy((void *)p, (const void *)res, size);
- data_access_exceeds_word_size();
barrier();
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-26 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-26 8:31 linux-next: build warnings after merge of the access_once tree Stephen Rothwell
2015-03-26 10:11 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-26 10:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-26 13:27 ` Will Deacon
2015-03-26 14:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-26 14:41 ` Will Deacon
2015-03-26 14:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-26 15:08 ` Will Deacon
2015-03-26 16:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-26 16:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-26 16:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-26 16:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-26 16:45 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
[not found] ` <CA+55aFw1WHJqSj+z-mJGY-kxrg_OsGp9jK9VBi+wB4zPgCkv_w@mail.gmail.com>
2015-03-26 17:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-03-26 17:17 ` Will Deacon
2015-03-26 17:23 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-26 19:42 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-26 16:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <CA+55aFzUPPSHakwbp-Y-SaXB+o1=V6rOknz7L3AYNXNPU1MSfg@mail.gmail.com>
2015-03-26 17:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-03-26 17:24 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-03-26 17:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-03-26 18:54 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150326164537.GI24151@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox