From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752786AbbC0MAn (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2015 08:00:43 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178]:33420 "EHLO mail-wi0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752296AbbC0MAk (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2015 08:00:40 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 12:00:33 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Linus Walleij Cc: Samuel Ortiz , Dmitry Torokhov , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linux Input Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] tc3589x OF only enforcement Message-ID: <20150327120033.GF15988@x1> References: <1426776765-18812-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 27 Mar 2015, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > > > These two patches removes the non-DT probe/config path from the > > TC3589x driver. I suggest merging both through the MFD tree if > > Dmitry can ACK the input patch. > > Lee it seems Dmitry ACKed these patches, can you merge those > two patches into MFD? I don't think there will be any cross-tree deps > so you can just carry them in MFD without any immutable branch business. Change of plan. 20f02d6 scuppers you plans unfortunately. Probably best if this goes in via the Input tree. Both patches unapplied. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog