From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753284AbbC0N65 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:58:57 -0400 Received: from e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com ([195.75.94.110]:39484 "EHLO e06smtp14.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752976AbbC0N6y (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2015 09:58:54 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 14:58:48 +0100 From: Heiko Carstens To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Jiri Slaby , jpoimboe@redhat.com, sjenning@redhat.com, vojtech@suse.cz, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] livepatch: add support on s390 Message-ID: <20150327135848.GB4379@osiris> References: <1427361017-23354-1-git-send-email-jslaby@suse.cz> <20150327091900.GA4379@osiris> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 15032713-0017-0000-0000-00000386A251 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 10:29:28AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Fri, 27 Mar 2015, Heiko Carstens wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 07:24:58PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > > On Thu, 26 Mar 2015, Jiri Slaby wrote: > > > > > > > This is a trivial port from kGraft. Module relocations are not > > > > supported. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby > > > > --- > > > > [v2] return ENOSYS > > > > [v3] proper return value from klp_check_compiler_support > > > > > > Applied to for-4.1/core. > > > > Hello Jiri, > > > > while I do appreciate your work on the s390 architecture backend for > > livepatching: this should go upstream only via the s390 tree or with > > an Ack from Martin or me. > > Fair enough; I merged it because I was convinced that we have your Ack for > the very same patch in our tree for kGraft, but now that I look again, we > apparently don't. So sorry for that. What is your standpoint on this one > then, please? I thought there was more available then the simple testcase within the kernel. But since the testcase works: Acked-by: Heiko Carstens