From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752576AbbC0QoU (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2015 12:44:20 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:45416 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750931AbbC0QoR (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Mar 2015 12:44:17 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 17:44:05 +0100 From: David Sterba To: nick Cc: clm@fb.com, jbacik@fb.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: How to do Header Dependency Check Properly for Kernel Patch Message-ID: <20150327164405.GA5758@suse.cz> Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, nick , clm@fb.com, jbacik@fb.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org References: <55149A03.4040807@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55149A03.4040807@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 07:45:07PM -0400, nick wrote: > I have a patch for moving over the rcu-string header file for btrfs to > the standard include headers in include/linux > as you stated this on a to do on the brtfs to do page for the > project's wiki page. The wiki page states that the task is already assigned https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Project_ideas#Move_rcu_string_out_of_btrfs_to_lib.2F besides that there were 8 iterations of the patchset, acked by the respective people. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1862689 > index de5e4f2..df8e981 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h > +++ b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h > @@ -15,11 +15,13 @@ > * Free Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, > * Boston, MA 021110-1307, USA. > */ > +#pragma once > > #ifndef __BTRFS_I__ > #define __BTRFS_I__ the pragmas are not used in kernel AFAIK, the ifndef right below the line serves the exact purpose.