From: Jeff Epler <jepler@unpythonic.net>
To: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>
Cc: "Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)" <Elliott@hp.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
"JBottomley@parallels.com" <JBottomley@parallels.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: kcalloc/kmalloc_array could BUILD_BUG_ON for too-big constant arguments (was Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] aic7xxx: replace kmalloc/memset by kzalloc)
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 14:48:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150327194824.GC88629@unpythonic.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5514A679.5030005@free-electrons.com>
The following is a sketch of how a macro kcalloc could BUILD_BUG_ON for
overflows of two compile-time operands, or call "kcalloc_variable" for
nonconstant arguments. Tested on gcc 4.7.2 only, since it's what I had to
hand. I didn't do any testing beyond checking that fn2 didn't build, and that
fn1/3 had plausible-looking code on x86_64.
typedef unsigned long size_t;
#define SIZE_MAX (~(size_t)0)
typedef int gfp_t;
extern void *kzalloc(size_t n, gfp_t flags);
extern void *kcalloc_variable(size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t flags);
#define BUILD_BUG_ON(condition) ((void)sizeof(char[1 - 2*!!(condition)]))
#define kcalloc(n, size, flags) \
__builtin_choose_expr(__builtin_constant_p((n) | (size)), \
( \
BUILD_BUG_ON((n) > SIZE_MAX / (size)), \
kzalloc((n) * (size), (flags)) \
), kcalloc_variable((n), (size), (flags)))
void fn1() { kcalloc(3, 3, 0); }
//void fn2() { kcalloc(2, ~(size_t)0, 0); }// compile-time BUILD_BUG_ON
void fn3(int i) { kcalloc(2, i, 0); }
Jeff
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-28 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-16 19:14 [PATCH] aic7xxx: replace kmalloc/memset by kzalloc Michael Opdenacker
2014-10-16 19:28 ` Joe Perches
2014-10-16 19:30 ` Michael Opdenacker
2014-10-16 20:05 ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2015-03-22 16:31 ` [PATCH] [RESEND] " Michael Opdenacker
2015-03-23 6:59 ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-03-24 20:46 ` Michael Opdenacker
2015-03-24 20:57 ` Joe Perches
2015-03-24 23:16 ` Elliott, Robert (Server Storage)
2015-03-27 0:38 ` Michael Opdenacker
2015-03-27 0:51 ` Michael Opdenacker
2015-03-27 19:48 ` Jeff Epler [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150327194824.GC88629@unpythonic.net \
--to=jepler@unpythonic.net \
--cc=Elliott@hp.com \
--cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).