linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Brad Spengler <spender@grsecurity.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	"linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org" 
	<linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/asm/entry: Remove user_mode_ignore_vm86()
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 11:02:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150329090233.GA1963@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150329070816.GD18007@gmail.com>


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:

> So what the function name wanted to express is something like this:
> 
> 	if (user_mode_vm86_mode_already_checked_so_this_is_marginally_faster_but_dont_use_it_otherwise_because_that_would_be_a_roothole()) 
> 	{
> 		...
> 	}
> 
> but that name was considered somewhat long.

So how about doing the patch below?

Thanks,

	Ingo

===================================>
>From 6677d6f073cfda7f1036eb06d13faaad5c6742cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 09:10:08 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] x86/asm/entry: Remove user_mode_ignore_vm86()

user_mode_ignore_vm86() can be used instead of user_mode(), in
places where we have already done a v8086_mode() security
check of ptregs.

But doing this check in the wrong place would be a bug that could
result in security problems, and also the naming still isn't very clear.

Furthermore, it only affects 32-bit kernels, while most development
happens on 64-bit kernels.

If we replace them with user_mode() checks then the cost is only a
very minor increase in various slowpaths:

   text             data   bss     dec              hex    filename
   10573391         703562 1753042 13029995         c6d26b vmlinux.o.before
   10573423         703562 1753042 13030027         c6d28b vmlinux.o.after

So lets get rid of this distinction once and for all.

Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h    | 17 -----------------
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/traps.c          |  6 +++---
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h
index d20bae298852..19507ffa5d28 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h
@@ -113,23 +113,6 @@ static inline int user_mode(struct pt_regs *regs)
 #endif
 }
 
-/*
- * This is the fastest way to check whether regs come from user space.
- * It is unsafe if regs might come from vm86 mode, though -- in vm86
- * mode, all bits of CS and SS are completely under the user's control.
- * The CPU considers vm86 mode to be CPL 3 regardless of CS and SS.
- *
- * Do NOT use this function unless you have already ruled out the
- * possibility that regs came from vm86 mode.
- *
- * We check for RPL != 0 instead of RPL == 3 because we don't use rings
- * 1 or 2 and this is more efficient.
- */
-static inline int user_mode_ignore_vm86(struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
-	return (regs->cs & SEGMENT_RPL_MASK) != 0;
-}
-
 static inline int v8086_mode(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 56f7e60ad732..e2888a3ad1e3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -2159,7 +2159,7 @@ static unsigned long code_segment_base(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	if (regs->flags & X86_VM_MASK)
 		return 0x10 * regs->cs;
 
-	if (user_mode_ignore_vm86(regs) && regs->cs != __USER_CS)
+	if (user_mode(regs) && regs->cs != __USER_CS)
 		return get_segment_base(regs->cs);
 #else
 	if (user_mode(regs) && !user_64bit_mode(regs) &&
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
index c8eb469a94a4..6751c5c58eec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ do_trap_no_signal(struct task_struct *tsk, int trapnr, char *str,
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	if (!user_mode_ignore_vm86(regs)) {
+	if (!user_mode(regs)) {
 		if (!fixup_exception(regs)) {
 			tsk->thread.error_code = error_code;
 			tsk->thread.trap_nr = trapnr;
@@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ do_general_protection(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
 	}
 
 	tsk = current;
-	if (!user_mode_ignore_vm86(regs)) {
+	if (!user_mode(regs)) {
 		if (fixup_exception(regs))
 			goto exit;
 
@@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ dotraplinkage void do_debug(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
 	 * We already checked v86 mode above, so we can check for kernel mode
 	 * by just checking the CPL of CS.
 	 */
-	if ((dr6 & DR_STEP) && !user_mode_ignore_vm86(regs)) {
+	if ((dr6 & DR_STEP) && !user_mode(regs)) {
 		tsk->thread.debugreg6 &= ~DR_STEP;
 		set_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_SINGLESTEP);
 		regs->flags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_TF;

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-29  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-19  1:33 [PATCH 0/9] user_mode_vm removal and associated cleanups Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-19  1:33 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86, fault: Use TASK_SIZE_MAX in is_prefetch Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-23 12:20   ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/mm/fault: Use TASK_SIZE_MAX in is_prefetch() tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-19  1:33 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86, perf: Fix incorrect TIF_IA32 check in code_segment_base Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-23 12:20   ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry, perf: Fix incorrect TIF_IA32 check in code_segment_base() tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-19  1:33 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86: Add user_mode_ignore_vm86 Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-23 12:26   ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry: Add user_mode_ignore_vm86() tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-23 19:38     ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-24 19:44       ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-24 19:46         ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-27 13:48           ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-29  7:08             ` Ingo Molnar
2015-03-29  9:02               ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-03-29 12:13                 ` [PATCH] x86/asm/entry: Remove user_mode_ignore_vm86() Borislav Petkov
2015-03-29 13:24                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-31 12:39                 ` [tip:x86/asm] " tip-bot for Ingo Molnar
2015-03-29 11:55               ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry: Add user_mode_ignore_vm86() Borislav Petkov
2015-03-29 20:51               ` Denys Vlasenko
2015-03-19  1:33 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86, perf: Explicitly optimize vm86 handling in code_segment_base Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-23 12:26   ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry, perf: Explicitly optimize vm86 handling in code_segment_base() tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-19  1:33 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86, traps: Use user_mode_ignore_vm86 where appropriate Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-23 12:27   ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry: Use user_mode_ignore_vm86() " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-19  1:33 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86: Make user_mode work correctly if regs came from vm86 mode Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-23 12:27   ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry: Make user_mode() work correctly if regs came from VM86 mode tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-19  1:33 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86, treewide: s/user_mode_vm/user_mode/g Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-23 12:27   ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry: Change all 'user_mode_vm()' calls to 'user_mode()' tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-19  1:33 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86: Remove user_mode_vm Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-23 12:28   ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry: Remove user_mode_vm() tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-19  1:33 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86, traps: Replace some open-coded vm86 checks with v8086_mode Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-23 12:28   ` [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry: Replace some open-coded VM86 checks with v8086_mode() checks tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2015-03-19  6:33 ` [PATCH 0/9] user_mode_vm removal and associated cleanups Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150329090233.GA1963@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=spender@grsecurity.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).