From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753088AbbC3Hog (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 30 Mar 2015 03:44:36 -0400
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:36554 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752691AbbC3Hof convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 30 Mar 2015 03:44:35 -0400
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 09:44:29 +0200
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
To: Pali =?UTF-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Honeyman <stevenhoneyman@gmail.com>,
        Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>,
        Jochen Eisinger <jochen@penguin-breeder.org>,
        Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: Allow to compile dell-smm-hwmon driver
 without /proc/i8k
Message-ID: <20150330094429.53eaacc1@endymion.delvare>
In-Reply-To: <201503282333.46803@pali>
References: <1427538255-10860-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com>
	<1427580377.2408.2.camel@x220>
	<CABz95_AZnyCH_0VYdx4bHV7KV=goNxz1YdvrUCFJQSOAqwwMug@mail.gmail.com>
	<201503282333.46803@pali>
Organization: SUSE Linux
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, 28 Mar 2015 23:33:46 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
> I think it would be better to locate on which bus are sensors 
> connected (smbus? isa? pci?), find out HW chips and wrote native 
> kernel drivers for them...
> 
> I scanned smbus (intel controller connected on pci) on my E6440 
> but there is no additional/unknown device. I have no idea where 
> else could be sensor device connected and accessible (from SMM or 
> kernel mode).

As much as I hate SMM, native access to a BIOS-owned device is not a
good idea, as is it dangerously racy. If anything, we are currently
trying to move _away_ from native drivers on a number of systems
(basically all systems where acpi_enforce_resources=lax is needed.)

On x86, ideally ACPI would offer a standard interface to the hardware
monitoring chip and the OS would need a single driver for all boards
out there. Failing that, ACPI should provide a clean and safe way to
access the chip's registers (read: some mutex to avoid concurrent
access to the registers by the BIOS and the OS.)

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support