public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
To: "Baxter, Jim" <jim_baxter@mentor.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Zapolskiy, Vladimir" <Vladimir_Zapolskiy@mentor.com>
Subject: Re: usb: gadget: f_fs: O_NONBLOCK waits MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:28:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150331202834.GA16918@saruman.tx.rr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <551AED33.2040206@mentor.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1721 bytes --]

Hi,

(it helps if you Cc the maintainer too :-)

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 07:53:39PM +0100, Baxter, Jim wrote:
> I have been looking at an issue where a phone that is the Function FS
> host sometimes locks up and causes the function:

which USB controller ? which kernel ? which platform ?

> static ssize_t ffs_epfile_io(struct file *file, struct ffs_io_data
> *io_data) in drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c to timeout after
> MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT jiffies.

yeah, that's pretty much "never timeout" :-)

> We are opening the ffs connection with the O_NONBLOCK option and this
> timeout seems to be far too long.

is this your own application ? How can I make sure it's correct ?

> The code causing the wait is here (line 834):
> 
> if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
>     /* nop */
> } else if (unlikely(
>         wait_for_completion_interruptible(&done))) {

right, this is waiting for the previous usb_ep_queue() to complete. Why
hasn't it completed yet ? Do you have a USB sniffer to check if data has
passed over the wire ? Did the host shifted any token in the wire trying
to move data around ?

>     ret = -EINTR;
>     usb_ep_dequeue(ep->ep, req);
> } else {
> 
> The function call wait_for_completion_interruptible(&done) equates to:
> wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout(&done, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
> 
> 
> I was wondering what to change to fix this, is it reasonable to use a
> very small timeout if it is O_NONBLOCK or is any blocking not allowed?
> 
> I would appreciate any thoughts on how this should work?

sounds like a bug on your USB peripheral controller driver. Which one is
that ? Again, which kernel ? Where are the logs ?

regards

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-31 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-31 18:53 usb: gadget: f_fs: O_NONBLOCK waits MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT Baxter, Jim
2015-03-31 20:28 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2015-04-01  8:06 ` Robert Baldyga
2015-04-01 17:29   ` Baxter, Jim
2015-04-02  0:23     ` Peter Chen
2015-05-22 11:12       ` Baxter, Jim
2015-05-25  1:55         ` Peter Chen
2015-06-01 16:25           ` Baxter, Jim
2015-06-02  3:01             ` Peter Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150331202834.GA16918@saruman.tx.rr.com \
    --to=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=Vladimir_Zapolskiy@mentor.com \
    --cc=jim_baxter@mentor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox