From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753083AbbDCSR0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2015 14:17:26 -0400 Received: from sauhun.de ([89.238.76.85]:36099 "EHLO pokefinder.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752899AbbDCSRX (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2015 14:17:23 -0400 Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2015 20:17:46 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Sebastian Hesselbarth Cc: Stephen Warren , Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Gregory Clement , Gabriel Dobato , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] i2c: mux-pinctrl: Rework to honor disabled child nodes Message-ID: <20150403181746.GA1298@katana> References: <550A05E5.3050100@gmail.com> <20150319100944.GA914@katana> <550AEF9D.6090307@wwwdotorg.org> <20150319160208.GF7657@katana> <550B3725.10209@gmail.com> <20150320101925.GC2071@katana> <20150321210028.GA1078@katana> <550EBDBC.9000903@gmail.com> <20150323183211.GB1128@katana> <5515C6B6.7080903@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5515C6B6.7080903@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > While thinking about it (and I still think of it as a 'big issue' > compared to the intention of the initial patch) I came to the > conclusion that I should maybe just go for a board-specific > i2c-mux-pinctrl node instead of adding it to the SoC dtsi. That will > also avoid doubled i2c busses on boards with just the default i2c > option. Ehrm, then please let me know what you decided on. If you chose the above road, then I don't need to think about the other questions :) --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVHtlKAAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2wm4QAIiTxWw6Zkn/iHvPbPMHwGKF 08BtWeP2dHAdBGtilPsYi9Ef90T1Svj4/y+jkVvz4oaP8UGlAiNjCjDt0prcejMg Wo2q7x3fGVPfperUh6W+mvlPf1uE6uL23/+SrcBqQmJAVXo2N8tX2BPn08fet60B o/JVhrgue/S38yEtTax6osRdb9jKnHIensjrwczwQvtf/ybYONLnD23WaBDaeswM Ck1RDc4w9Vbx66i3ZLX4AI6Bl+p5SGXZ2S++Gju515d1TWWFEUCrCaYAPksh0K0a toDvWqfbsbrCJ26SHAsa8PohEAgp19w8SwURv6XjGJK/xVGrEFGbbHAusjD50Kg+ X5a7PvDEV9Py5QMF5k6rL3OL2/1cdU8DFUJUFU2P94EFgu5U8twvG5Hu+xSFs3z/ 03cOBlCF/JlBsgDSpmZz9VRzr5BfUe/sVXZi0v4aM03KR+DZAyF14EN8gtKBhICE FtPkGhrjerVCFWdLh0Lnh2C79/6tTMnpXQEaWklCLtvSpcBpXlh/XG79QUg1FaPQ z0YxUbK3q5LbHWfIbq1xQad/fQrqE4h8lmSWI0UfhDN13vVEzuPIGhiw5C3WkKwy LTOsw0WWLBvp/AbkB/zahsDn6pW7klVwGs7IJvBJQ1YncXrxi/Gbsw8WzR3rn2QT rGvhUUTHwDFWI3LzztBq =JacI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J--