Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] clk: dt: Introduce binding for always-on clock support

Maxime Ripard
2015-04-29T20:30:06Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 913 bytes --]

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:11:47PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > This useful binding should be accepted and people should not abuse
> > > it. If they do and the vendor Maintainer's review and accept then
> > > they have no foundation for recourse.
> > >
> > > Would you prefer it if I made the warning starker?
> >
> > Perhaps you can add a check for "clock-always-on" to scripts/checkpatch.pl,
> > to make people aware they should think twice?
>
> That's a really nice idea!
>
> Maxime, would that make you happ(y|ier)?

Do whatever you want.

This binding is going to be merged no matter what, so my opinion has
really little value here.

Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]