From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756214AbbDJWLQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Apr 2015 18:11:16 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f171.google.com ([209.85.217.171]:32833 "EHLO mail-lb0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751575AbbDJWLP (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Apr 2015 18:11:15 -0400 Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 01:11:12 +0300 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Oleg Nesterov , Denys Vlasenko , Pavel Emelyanov , Andrey Wagin , Andy Lutomirski , Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen , "H. Peter Anvin" , Al Viro , X86 ML , LKML , Linus Torvalds , Borislav Petkov , Pavel Emelyanov Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86_64,signal: Fix SS handling for signals delivered to 64-bit programs Message-ID: <20150410221112.GO11527@moon> References: <5509EF82.60900@parallels.com> <20150319073512.GA27066@moon> <20150320115622.GR27066@moon> <20150320120419.GS27066@moon> <20150320140738.GA12509@redhat.com> <20150320144720.GW27066@moon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 02:59:19PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > As long as you're doing that, any chance you could remove CPREG1(gs) > and CPREG1(fs) as well? They haven't had any effect since > 2.5.something_very_old, and the kernel might want to reuse those > sigcontext slots some day. Yeah, absolutely. I'm implementing 32bits support for criu now so I managed to postprone this task but will implement on the week. Thanks for reminder!