From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755337AbbDOJY7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2015 05:24:59 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.220.51]:35617 "EHLO mail-pa0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753202AbbDOJYt (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2015 05:24:49 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 14:54:40 +0530 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Jean Delvare , Wolfram Sang , Willy Tarreau , Greg Kroah-Hartman , One Thousand Gnomes , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] parport: modify parport subsystem to use devicemodel Message-ID: <20150415092440.GB3198@sudip-PC> References: <1429084124-2271-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> <1429084124-2271-2-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> <20150415083359.GJ10964@mwanda> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150415083359.GJ10964@mwanda> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:33:59AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 01:18:41PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > The difference between parport_register_device() and > parport_register_dev() isn't clear from the name. i kept the name similar deliberately as I thought that after all the drivers are modified to use these new api the old functions will be removed so then this name will have some meaning. so, should i send a v2 now with the changes you suggested or should we wait for some review about the functionality and testing? regards sudip > > regards, > dan carpenter >