From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Andreas Messerschmid <andreas@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: make print_lock_name() robust against non-existing lock_class
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 17:39:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150416153936.GA7093@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150416153503.GC12676@worktop.ger.corp.intel.com>
* Peter Zijlstra | 2015-04-16 17:35:03 [+0200]:
>On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 04:50:21PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
>> Andreas confirmed that it works for him on v3.18 with minor adjustment.
>>
>> <---
>> + struct held_lock lock = READ_ONCE(*hlock);
>> + unsigned int class_idx = lock.class_idx;
>> --->
>>
>
>I'm confused by the need for that. What was the failure with the
>proposed patch?
It was tested on v3.18, there might have been a change between v3.18 &
4.0. The patch as-is did no compile:
in file included from arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:4:0,
from include/linux/mutex.h:13,
from kernel/locking/lockdep.c:29:
kernel/locking/lockdep.c: In function ‘print_lock’:
kernel/locking/lockdep.c:558:37: error: ‘typeof’ applied to a bit-field
unsigned int class_idx = READ_ONCE(hlock->class_idx);
^
include/linux/compiler.h:262:20: note: in definition of macro ‘READ_ONCE’
({ union { typeof(x) __val; char __c[1]; } __u; __read_once_size(&(x), __u.__c, sizeof(x)); __u.__val; })
^
include/linux/compiler.h:262:11: error: cannot take address of bit-field ‘class_idx’
({ union { typeof(x) __val; char __c[1]; } __u; __read_once_size(&(x), __u.__c, sizeof(x)); __u.__val; })
^
kernel/locking/lockdep.c:558:27: note: in expansion of macro ‘READ_ONCE’
unsigned int class_idx = READ_ONCE(hlock->class_idx);
^
include/linux/compiler.h:262:88: error: ‘sizeof’ applied to a bit-field
({ union { typeof(x) __val; char __c[1]; } __u; __read_once_size(&(x), __u.__c, sizeof(x)); __u.__val; })
^
kernel/locking/lockdep.c:558:27: note: in expansion of macro ‘READ_ONCE’
unsigned int class_idx = READ_ONCE(hlock->class_idx);
^
scripts/Makefile.build:258: recipe for target 'kernel/locking/lockdep.o' failed
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-16 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-15 13:24 [PATCH] lockdep: make print_lock_name() robust against non-existing lock_class Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-04-15 14:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-16 14:50 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2015-04-16 15:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-16 15:39 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2015-04-16 15:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150416153936.GA7093@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=andreas@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox