linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: qemu:arm test failure due to commit 8053871d0f7f (smp: Fix smp_call_function_single_async() locking)
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 20:01:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150419180140.GA8934@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5533B6D7.9050101@roeck-us.net>


* Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:

> > I _think_ most such callers calling an SMP function call for 
> > offline or out of range CPUs are at minimum racy.
>
> Not really; at least the online cpu part is an absolutely normal use 
> case for qemu-arm.

The problem is that an IPI is attempted to be sent to a non-existent 
CPU AFAICS, right?

> Sure, you can argue that "this isn't the real system", and that 
> qemu-arm should be "fixed", but there are reasons - the emulation is 
> (much) slower if the number of CPUs is set to 4, and not everyone 
> who wants to use qemu has a system with as many CPUs as the emulated 
> system would normally have.

That's all fine and good, but why is an IPI sent to a non-existent 
CPU? It's not like we don't know which CPU is up and down.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-19 18:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-18 23:23 qemu:arm test failure due to commit 8053871d0f7f (smp: Fix smp_call_function_single_async() locking) Guenter Roeck
2015-04-18 23:40 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-04-19  0:04   ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-19  0:36     ` Guenter Roeck
2015-04-19  1:56     ` Guenter Roeck
2015-04-19  3:39       ` Rabin Vincent
2015-04-19  4:03         ` Guenter Roeck
     [not found]         ` <CA+55aFw4FSja+VBuCYJ7wLXKVRQZ7w6vOUaUJ4B=FXyBmNkrUg@mail.gmail.com>
2015-04-19  8:56           ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-19  9:31             ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-19 14:08               ` Guenter Roeck
2015-04-19 18:01                 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-04-19 20:34                   ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-20  5:39                     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-04-20 12:17                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-04-20 15:53                       ` Linus Torvalds
2015-04-20 15:41                   ` Rabin Vincent
2015-04-20 10:46                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150419180140.GA8934@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rabin@rab.in \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).