linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] sched/deadline: reschedule if stop task slip in after pull operations
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 07:02:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150420230234.GA7865@kernel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150420225901.GA7692@kernel>

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 06:59:02AM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>Hi Juri,
>On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:27:22AM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>On 06/04/2015 09:53, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>> pull_dl_task can drop (and re-acquire) rq->lock, this means a stop task 
>>> can slip in, in which case we need to reschedule. This patch add the 
>>> reschedule when the scenario occurs.
>>> 
>>
>>Ok, I guess it can happen. Doesn't RT have the same problem? It seems that
>>it also has to deal with DL tasks slipping in, right?
>
>Yeah, I will send another patch to handle RT class in the v2 patchset. :)

Oh, I just find I have already done them in patch 7/7.

Regards,
Wanpeng Li 

>
>Regards,
>Wanpeng Li 
>
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>- Juri
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>  kernel/sched/deadline.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>> 
>>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>>> index b8b9355..844da0f 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>>> @@ -1739,7 +1739,13 @@ static void switched_from_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>>>  	if (!task_on_rq_queued(p) || rq->dl.dl_nr_running)
>>>  		return;
>>>  
>>> -	if (pull_dl_task(rq))
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * pull_dl_task() can drop (and re-acquire) rq->lock; this
>>> +	 * means a stop task can slip in, in which case we need to
>>> +	 * reschedule.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	if (pull_dl_task(rq) ||
>>> +		(rq->stop && task_on_rq_queued(rq->stop)))
>>>  		resched_curr(rq);
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> @@ -1786,6 +1792,14 @@ static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
>>>  			pull_dl_task(rq);
>>>  
>>>  		/*
>>> +		 * pull_dl_task() can drop (and re-acquire) rq->lock; this
>>> +		 * means a stop task can slip in, in which case we need to
>>> +		 * reschedule.
>>> +		 */
>>> +		if (rq->stop && task_on_rq_queued(rq->stop))
>>> +			resched_curr(rq);
>>> +
>>> +		/*
>>>  		 * If we now have a earlier deadline task than p,
>>>  		 * then reschedule, provided p is still on this
>>>  		 * runqueue.
>>> 

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-20 23:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-06  8:53 [PATCH 1/7] sched/deadline: fix try to pull pinned dl tasks in pull algorithm Wanpeng Li
2015-04-06  8:53 ` [PATCH 2/7] sched/deadline: make init_sched_dl_class() __init Wanpeng Li
2015-04-07 13:48   ` Juri Lelli
2015-04-07 23:00     ` Wanpeng Li
2015-04-06  8:53 ` [PATCH 3/7] sched/deadline: reduce rq lock contention by eliminating locking of non-feasible target Wanpeng Li
2015-04-07 13:48   ` Juri Lelli
2015-04-07 22:57     ` Wanpeng Li
2015-04-06  8:53 ` [PATCH 4/7] sched/deadline: reschedule if stop task slip in after pull operations Wanpeng Li
2015-04-20 10:27   ` Juri Lelli
2015-04-20 22:59     ` Wanpeng Li
2015-04-20 23:02       ` Wanpeng Li [this message]
2015-04-21  8:22         ` Juri Lelli
2015-04-06  8:53 ` [PATCH 5/7] sched/deadline: drop duplicate init_sched_dl_class declaration Wanpeng Li
2015-04-08  8:47   ` Juri Lelli
2015-04-08  8:33     ` Wanpeng Li
2015-04-06  8:53 ` [PATCH 6/7] sched/deadline: depend on clearing throttled status in replenish_dl_entity Wanpeng Li
2015-04-21  8:16   ` Juri Lelli
2015-04-21  8:10     ` Wanpeng Li
2015-04-06  8:53 ` [PATCH 7/7] sched/rt: reschedule if stop/dl task slip in after pull operations Wanpeng Li
2015-04-14 23:10 ` [PATCH 1/7] sched/deadline: fix try to pull pinned dl tasks in pull algorithm Wanpeng Li
2015-04-27  9:42 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-05-06  7:11   ` Wanpeng Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150420230234.GA7865@kernel \
    --to=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).