From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756738AbbDWEaK (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 23 Apr 2015 00:30:10 -0400
Received: from mail-pd0-f180.google.com ([209.85.192.180]:33892 "EHLO
	mail-pd0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751000AbbDWEaH (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 23 Apr 2015 00:30:07 -0400
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 13:30:22 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 03/10] zram: use idr instead of `zram_devices' array
Message-ID: <20150423043022.GE724@swordfish>
References: <1429185356-11096-1-git-send-email-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
 <1429185356-11096-4-git-send-email-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
 <20150423022358.GB24928@blaptop>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150423022358.GB24928@blaptop>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On (04/23/15 11:23), Minchan Kim wrote:
[..]

> > +static int zram_exit_cb(int id, void *ptr, void *data)
> 
> trivial: I prefer remove to exit.
> 

ok.

> > +{
> > +	zram_remove(ptr);
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> >  
> > -	kfree(zram_devices);
> > +static void destroy_devices(void)
> > +{
> > +	idr_for_each(&zram_index_idr, &zram_exit_cb, NULL);
> > +	idr_destroy(&zram_index_idr);
> >  	unregister_blkdev(zram_major, "zram");
> > -	pr_info("Destroyed %u device(s)\n", nr);
> > +	pr_info("Destroyed device(s)\n");
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int __init zram_init(void)
> > @@ -1283,16 +1302,9 @@ static int __init zram_init(void)
> >  		return -EBUSY;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	/* Allocate the device array and initialize each one */
> > -	zram_devices = kzalloc(num_devices * sizeof(struct zram), GFP_KERNEL);
> > -	if (!zram_devices) {
> > -		unregister_blkdev(zram_major, "zram");
> > -		return -ENOMEM;
> > -	}
> > -
> >  	for (dev_id = 0; dev_id < num_devices; dev_id++) {
> > -		ret = create_device(&zram_devices[dev_id], dev_id);
> > -		if (ret)
> > +		ret = zram_add(dev_id);
> > +		if (ret != 0)
> 
> It's better to check ret < 0 rather than ret != 0.
> 

yes, it's

        for (dev_id = 0; dev_id < num_devices; dev_id++) {
                mutex_lock(&zram_index_mutex);
                ret = zram_add(dev_id);
                mutex_unlock(&zram_index_mutex);
                if (ret < 0)
                        goto out_error;
        }


at the end of the patch set.


will clean up everything and resubmit after the merge window, next week.


thanks!

	-ss

> Otherwise,
> Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> 
> -- 
> Kind regards,
> Minchan Kim
>