From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirsky <amluto@amacapital.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] context_tracking: remove local_irq_save from __acct_update_integrals
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:11:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150424091156.GB4089@osiris> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150423215713.3334ae6f@annuminas.surriel.com>
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 09:57:13PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/tsacct.c b/kernel/tsacct.c
> index 975cb49e32bf..0b967f116a6b 100644
> --- a/kernel/tsacct.c
> +++ b/kernel/tsacct.c
> @@ -126,23 +126,29 @@ static void __acct_update_integrals(struct task_struct *tsk,
> if (likely(tsk->mm)) {
> cputime_t time, dtime;
> struct timeval value;
> - unsigned long flags;
> u64 delta;
>
> - local_irq_save(flags);
> time = stime + utime;
> dtime = time - tsk->acct_timexpd;
> + /*
> + * This code is called both from irq context and from
> + * task context. There is a race where irq context advances
> + * tsk->acct_timexpd to a value larger than time, creating
> + * a negative value. In that case, the irq has already
> + * updated the statistics.
> + */
> + if (unlikely((signed long)dtime <= 0))
> + return;
FWIW, I think you either need a barrier() before the if-statement or use
READ_ONCE() when reading tsk->acct_timexpd above.
Otherwise the compiler could (in theory at least) generate code which
would translate to
if (unlikely(time <= tsk->acct_timexpd))
in order to achieve the same result, no?
Besides that cputime_t might be 64 bit in size, therefore you don't have
much of a guarentee that reading tsk->acct_timexpd happens atomically on
32 bit architectures, so you _may_ end up with garbage, no?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-24 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-24 1:57 [PATCH] context_tracking: remove local_irq_save from __acct_update_integrals Rik van Riel
2015-04-24 9:11 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2015-04-24 15:10 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150424091156.GB4089@osiris \
--to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=amluto@amacapital.com \
--cc=fweisbec@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox