From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965971AbbDXPvM (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:51:12 -0400 Received: from mail-qg0-f51.google.com ([209.85.192.51]:34951 "EHLO mail-qg0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030848AbbDXPvD (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:51:03 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 11:50:59 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Alexey Dobriyan Cc: xiaoming.wang@intel.com, Linux Kernel , Mel Gorman , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: move the adding option Ngid to the end of proc/PID/status Message-ID: <20150424155059.GE24029@htj.duckdns.org> References: <20150417142605.GA1954@htj.duckdns.org> <20150417151259.GA16743@htj.duckdns.org> <20150421140007.GA22502@p183.telecom.by> <20150421151119.GB9455@htj.duckdns.org> <20150423203226.GA1765@p183.telecom.by> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150423203226.GA1765@p183.telecom.by> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:32:26PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > There are 2 fields before Ngid and 35+ after Ngid. So the risk is not > the same. Potentionally, Ngid addition broke almost every parser. I don't get how we reach completely different conclusions from the same observation. This patch changes the offset for the 35+ fields after Ngid in the current kernel instead of 4 something fields. How is that better? -- tejun