From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031300AbbDXTxX (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:53:23 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:55313 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933695AbbDXTxT (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2015 15:53:19 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 21:53:16 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jeff Moyer Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Tejun Heo , Ming Lin , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: remove unused BIO_RW_BLOCK and BIO_EOF flags Message-ID: <20150424195316.GA20013@lst.de> References: <1429904462-16998-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1429904462-16998-2-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 03:47:37PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Any particular reason you elected to leave a hole in the numbering? I > don't have a preference either way, but I don't think there's any harm > in compressing it. This was the simplest way to do it and I'm a lazy bastard.