public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] enforce function inlining for hot functions
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 01:10:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150424231056.GA6321@virgo.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150424201340.GD5561@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

* Paul E. McKenney | 2015-04-24 13:13:40 [-0700]:

>Hmmm...  allyesconfig would have PROVE_RCU=y, which would mean that the
>above two would contain lockdep calls that might in some cases defeat
>inlining.  With the more typical production choice of PROVE_RCU=n, I would
>expect these to just be a call instruction, which should get inlined.


Ok, here are the results:

with PROVE_RCU=y:
    rcu_read_lock: 383 duplicates
with PROVE_RCU=n:
    rcu_read_lock: 114 duplicates


If you look at the function anatomy of rcu_read_lock you often see the
following definitions:

<rcu_read_lock>:
 55                        push   %rbp
 48 89 e5                  mov    %rsp,%rbp
 48 c7 c7 50 64 e7 85      mov    $0xffffffff85e76450,%rdi
 e8 ce ff ff ff            callq  ffffffff816af206 <rcu_lock_acquire>
 5d                        pop    %rbp
 c3                        retq

but sometimes rcu_read_lock looks:

<rcu_read_lock>:
 55                        push   %rbp
 48 89 e5                  mov    %rsp,%rbp
 50                        push   %rax
 68 83 1e 1c 81            pushq  $0xffffffff811c1e83
 b9 02 00 00 00            mov    $0x2,%ecx
 31 d2                     xor    %edx,%edx
 45 31 c9                  xor    %r9d,%r9d
 45 31 c0                  xor    %r8d,%r8d
 31 f6                     xor    %esi,%esi
 48 c7 c7 50 64 e7 85      mov    $0xffffffff85e76450,%rdi
 e8 86 4c f9 ff            callq  ffffffff81156b2e <lock_acquire>
 5a                        pop    %rdx
 59                        pop    %rcx
 c9                        leaveq   
 c3                        retq


Means rcu_lock_acquire() is inlined here - but not in every compilation unit.
Don't know exactly what forces gcc to inline not everywhere. Maybe register
pressure in the function unit, or at least gcc is think that. I don't know.

At the end you may notice that gcc inlining decisions are not always perfect
and a little bit fuzzy (sure, they have their metric/scoring system). And
sometimes the inlining should be enforced - as this patch do for some important
functions. But as I said we should not enforce it everywhere, rather we should
pray for better heuristics and let the compiler choose the best strategy (and
incorporate -Os/-O2 decisions too). I think this is the best compromise here.

Cheers, Hagen

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-04-24 23:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-23 21:40 [PATCH] enforce function inlining for hot functions Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2015-04-24 19:49 ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-24 20:13   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-04-24 20:44     ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2015-04-24 23:10     ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer [this message]
2015-04-25 10:31       ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-04-25 13:26         ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2015-04-25 13:51           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-04-24 20:39   ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2015-04-25 10:53     ` Markus Trippelsdorf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150424231056.GA6321@virgo.local \
    --to=hagen@jauu.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox