Re: arm/arm64 perf build issue with mainline

[Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 02:40:17PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:13:02AM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
> > On 4/27/15 10:26 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > >Em Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:21:54AM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
> > >>On 4/24/15 10:22 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > >>>I don't have a SPARC machine to hand, but we could check that the character
> > >>>immediately following "CPU" is a number [0-9].
> > >>
> > >>I have access to 1 or 2 or ...
> > >>
> > >>Yes, it needs start with CPU and be all caps (there are other Cpu lines) and
> > >>a cpu number follows:
> > >>
> > >>CPU0:           online
> > >>CPU1:           online
> > >>CPU2:           online
> > >>CPU3:           online
> > >>...
> > >
> > >Ok, any progress here?
> > 
> > I think the right thing to do is to remove JOBS completely.
> 
> That is up for discussion, Ingo, Jiri, Namhyung, others?
>  
> > Barring that use of getconf with a fallback to grepping /proc/cpuinfo.
> 
> Ok, but no patch so far doing that, right? 8-)

heh, I've got the idea that you're preparing something ;-)

as for me I've got used to the automatic -jX being added,
so I'd prefer we fix that JOBS setup for arm

I'll try to send something ;-)

jirka