From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] signals: Generate warning when flush_signals() is called from non-kthread context
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 21:38:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150501193813.GA2812@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFziVpH1qyf8M+GdJxh3oJWd84pdJbo94kuMfSi1QscLew@mail.gmail.com>
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Alex Williamson
> <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > - Flush signals on interrupted wait to retain polling interval (Alex Williamson)
>
> This cannot *possibly* be right. If I read this patch right, you're
> randomly just getting rid of signals. No way in hell is that correct.
>
> "flush_signals()" is only for kernel threads, where it's a hacky
> alternative to actually handling them (since kernel threads never
> rreturn to user space and cannot really "handle" a signal). But you're
> doing it in the ->remove handler for the device, which can be called
> by arbitrary system processes. This is not a kernel thread thing, as
> far as I can see.
>
> If you cannot handle signals, you damn well shouldn't be using
> "wait_event_interruptible_timeout()" to begin with. Get rid of the
> "interruptible", since it apparently *isn't* interruptible.
>
> So I'm not pulling this.
>
> Now I'm worried that other drivers do insane things like this. I
> wonder if we should add some sanity test to flush_signals() to make
> sure that it can only ever get called from a kernel thread.
>
> Oleg?
So there are these uses:
triton:~/tip> git grep -lw flush_signals
arch/arm/common/bL_switcher.c
Looks safe: used within the bL_switcher_thread() kthread.
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_main.c
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_nl.c
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_receiver.c
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_worker.c
Couldn't convince myself it's safe, but it appears to be. (Call chains
are obfuscated in various ways that makes it hard to tell where a
given function execute.)
drivers/md/md.c
drivers/md/raid1.c
drivers/md/raid5.c
Hm, so I'm not super sure about the flush_signals() in
raid1.c:make_request() AFAICS we can do direct RAID1 writes in
raid1_unplug(). That looks unsafe ... I've Cc:-ed Neil.
raid5.c seems safe: raid5_unplug() doesn't create requests directly,
leaves it all for the mddev kthread.
drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c
drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_tgt.c
drivers/scsi/bnx2i/bnx2i_iscsi.c
drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c
drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_login.c
drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c
Couldn't fully check it due to excessive complexity, but seemed safe.
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_cmd.c
drivers/staging/rtl8712/osdep_service.h
Looks safe: done in RTW_CMD_THREAD and 'padapter' kthreads.
drivers/w1/w1_family.c
drivers/w1/w1_int.c
Looks unsafe: called from various module exit handlers in:
drivers/w1/slaves/w1_bq27000.c
drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2406.c
drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2408.c
drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2413.c
drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2423.c
drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2431.c
drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2433.c
drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2760.c
drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2780.c
drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2781.c
drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds28e04.c
drivers/w1/slaves/w1_smem.c
drivers/w1/slaves/w1_therm.c
which would be executed in rmmod context, losing signals.
Cc:-ed Evgeniy.
fs/lockd/svc.c
fs/nfs/callback.c
fs/nfsd/nfssvc.c
Looks safe: lockd, nfsd plus nfsv4.%u-svc kthreads.
kernel/locking/rtmutex-tester.c
Looks safe: used within a kthread.
include/linux/sched.h
kernel/signal.c
Both safe ;-)
I also found a __flush_signals() use in:
security/selinux/hooks.c
Now that's selinux_bprm_committed_creds(), apparently executed on
exec(). Also does stuff like:
memset(&itimer, 0, sizeof itimer);
for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
do_setitimer(i, &itimer, NULL);
and unblocks signals as well:
sigemptyset(¤t->blocked);
but this appears to be kind of legit: the task failed to get the
required permissions, and guns go off.
In any case, it seems to me that the patch below would be justified?
Totally untested and so. __flush_signals() not affected.
Thanks,
Ingo
---
kernel/signal.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index d51c5ddd855c..100e30afe5d2 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -427,6 +427,10 @@ void flush_signals(struct task_struct *t)
{
unsigned long flags;
+ /* Only kthreads are allowed to destroy signals: */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(current->flags & PF_KTHREAD)))
+ return;
+
spin_lock_irqsave(&t->sighand->siglock, flags);
__flush_signals(t);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&t->sighand->siglock, flags);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-01 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-01 17:40 [GIT PULL] VFIO fixes for v4.1-rc2 Alex Williamson
2015-05-01 18:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-01 18:48 ` Alex Williamson
2015-05-01 20:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-01 22:03 ` Alex Williamson
2015-05-01 19:38 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-05-02 8:30 ` [PATCH] signals: Generate warning when flush_signals() is called from non-kthread context NeilBrown
2015-05-02 16:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-07 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-04 17:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-07 13:33 ` Jiri Kosina
2015-05-07 22:37 ` NeilBrown
2015-05-02 11:56 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2015-05-02 16:33 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-05-03 17:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-04 16:45 ` [PATCH 0/1] signals: don't abuse __flush_signals() in selinux_bprm_committed_creds() Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-04 16:45 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2015-05-04 19:43 ` Paul Moore
2015-05-06 10:19 ` [PATCH] signals: Generate warning when flush_signals() is called from non-kthread context Ingo Molnar
2015-05-01 20:11 ` [GIT PULL] VFIO fixes for v4.1-rc2 Richard Weinberger
2015-05-01 21:09 ` Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150501193813.GA2812@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zbr@ioremap.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).