From: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow TCP connections to cache SYN packet for userspace inspection
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 16:29:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150501202908.GC6113@akamai.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430511800.3711.138.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3551 bytes --]
On Fri, 01 May 2015, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 16:14 -0400, Eric B Munson wrote:
> > On Fri, 01 May 2015, Tom Herbert wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 13:43 -0400, Eric B Munson wrote:
> > > >> In order to enable policy decisions in userspace, the data contained in
> > > >> the SYN packet would be useful for tracking or identifying connections.
> > > >> Only parts of this data are available to userspace after the hand shake
> > > >> is completed. This patch exposes a new setsockopt() option that will,
> > > >> when used with a listening socket, ask the kernel to cache the skb
> > > >> holding the SYN packet for retrieval later. The SYN skbs will not be
> > > >> saved while the kernel is in syn cookie mode.
> > > >>
> > > >> The same option will ask the kernel for the packet headers when used
> > > >> with getsockopt() with the socket returned from accept(). The cached
> > > >> packet will only be available for the first getsockopt() call, the skb
> > > >> is consumed after the requested data is copied to userspace. Subsequent
> > > >> calls will return -ENOENT. Because of this behavior, getsockopt() will
> > > >> return -E2BIG if the caller supplied a buffer that is too small to hold
> > > >> the skb header.
> > > >>
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@akamai.com>
> > > >> Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
> > > >> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
> > > >> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
> > > >> Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
> > > >> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> > > >> Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org
> > > >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > > >> ---
> > > >
> > > > We have a similar patch here at Google, but we do not hold one skb and
> > > > dst per saved syn. That can be ~4KB for some drivers.
> > > >
> > > > Only a kmalloc() with the needed part (headers), usually less than 128
> > > > bytes. We store the length in first byte of this allocation.
> > > >
> > > > This has a huge difference if you want to have ~4 million request socks.
> > > >
> > > +1 on kmalloc solution. I posted a similar patch a couple of years ago
> > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/146034/. There was pushback on
> > > memory usage and this having to narrow of a use case.
> > >
> > > Tom
> > >
> >
> > I cached the skb largely to take advantage of the built in reference
> > counting and avoid having to manage allocating memory and ownership of
> > said memory. For V2, how about I keep the skb reference in the request
> > structure and kmalloc() a buffer, to be owned by the tcp sock structure,
> > when the new tcp socket is created? This would also simplify the
> > getsockopt() so that the data was available to all callers until the
> > socket is closed.
>
> Please do not keep a reference on skb. This has a too big cost.
>
> Have you read that we plan to have up to 4 or 10 million request socks ?
>
> skb also holds a dst.
>
> We can upstream our implementation (based on Tom prior patch), we have
> been using it more than 2 years with success.
>
>
As long as your implementation provides the IP and TCP headers, I would
be happy with that. I am also happy to rework my implementation to
extract and cache information when the request structure is built. If
you all have an implementation that you want to post, I will add my ack
if it meets our needs as well.
Eric
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-01 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-01 17:43 [PATCH] Allow TCP connections to cache SYN packet for userspace inspection Eric B Munson
2015-05-01 18:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-05-01 19:55 ` Tom Herbert
2015-05-01 20:14 ` Eric B Munson
2015-05-01 20:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-05-01 20:29 ` Eric B Munson [this message]
2015-05-01 20:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-05-01 19:27 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-05-01 20:01 ` Eric B Munson
2015-05-01 20:28 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150501202908.GC6113@akamai.com \
--to=emunson@akamai.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom@herbertland.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox