From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751953AbbECUa4 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Sun, 3 May 2015 16:30:56 -0400
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:52998 "EHLO
	mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751896AbbECUar (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 3 May 2015 16:30:47 -0400
Date: Sun, 3 May 2015 21:54:42 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Abhishek Bist <ishubist@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, abhishek@emblogic.org,
        stankus.modestas@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging : wlan-ng: fix memcpy with ether_addr_copy in
 p80211conv.c
Message-ID: <20150503195442.GA20053@kroah.com>
References: <1430478517-15601-1-git-send-email-ishubist@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1430478517-15601-1-git-send-email-ishubist@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 04:38:37PM +0530, Abhishek Bist wrote:
> This is a patch which fixes memcpy warning found by a checpatch.pl in p80211conv.c
> and replaces memcpy with ether_addr_copy.

How do you "know" it is safe to do this?  Please prove it.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Abhishek-Bist <ishubist@gmail.com>

Your From: name and this name do not match :(

thanks,

greg k-h