From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Benoit Cousson <bcousson@baylibre.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] x86: remove cpu_**_mask() functions
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 13:22:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150504112245.GA31627@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430735304-14866-1-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
* Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> wrote:
> Two functions defined in asm/smp.h: cpu_sibling_mask() and cpu_core_mask(),
> have the same functionality as macros defined in linux/topology.h:
> topology_thread_cpumask() and topology_core_cpumask() respectively.
>
> They are not documented and are architecture specific. Also: different
> naming for the same functionality (in case of cpu_sibling_mask() and
> topology_thread_cpumask()) is a bit misleading.
>
> This series makes all the callers switch to using the topology.h macros
> and removes their smp.h counterparts. While we're at it: rename
> topology_thread_cpumask() to topology_sibling_cpumask() to be
> consistent with the term used in the scheduler.
>
> The same duplication exists on powerpc.
>
> NOTE: patch 2/9 had been already submitted separately but didn't
> receive any attention, so I'm attaching it to this series.
>
> v2:
> - renamed topology_thread_cpumask() to topology_sibling_cpumask()
> - updated Documentation/cputopology.txt
>
> v1:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/30/188
>
> Bartosz Golaszewski (9):
> topology: rename topology_thread_cpumask()
> Documentation: update cputopology.txt
> coretemp: replace cpu_sibling_mask() with topology_sibling_cpumask()
> powernow-k8: replace cpu_core_mask() with topology_core_cpumask()
> p4-clockmod: replace cpu_sibling_mask() with topology_sibling_cpumask()
> acpi-cpufreq: replace cpu_**_mask() with topology_**_cpumask()
> speedstep-ich: replace cpu_sibling_mask() with topology_sibling_cpumask()
> x86: replace cpu_**_mask() with topology_**_cpumask()
> x86: remove cpu_sibling_mask() and cpu_core_mask()
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Ingo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-04 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-04 10:28 [PATCH v2 0/9] x86: remove cpu_**_mask() functions Bartosz Golaszewski
2015-05-04 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] topology: rename topology_thread_cpumask() Bartosz Golaszewski
2015-05-06 11:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-04 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] Documentation: update cputopology.txt Bartosz Golaszewski
2015-05-04 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] coretemp: replace cpu_sibling_mask() with topology_sibling_cpumask() Bartosz Golaszewski
2015-05-04 13:16 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-05-04 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] powernow-k8: replace cpu_core_mask() with topology_core_cpumask() Bartosz Golaszewski
2015-05-05 7:07 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-04 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] p4-clockmod: replace cpu_sibling_mask() with topology_sibling_cpumask() Bartosz Golaszewski
2015-05-05 7:07 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-04 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] acpi-cpufreq: replace cpu_**_mask() with topology_**_cpumask() Bartosz Golaszewski
2015-05-05 7:08 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-04 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] speedstep-ich: replace cpu_sibling_mask() with topology_sibling_cpumask() Bartosz Golaszewski
2015-05-05 7:08 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-04 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] x86: replace cpu_**_mask() with topology_**_cpumask() Bartosz Golaszewski
2015-05-04 10:28 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] x86: remove cpu_sibling_mask() and cpu_core_mask() Bartosz Golaszewski
2015-05-04 11:22 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150504112245.GA31627@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bcousson@baylibre.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox