From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@126.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Xunlei Pang <pang.xunlei@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/rt: Check to push task away when its affinity is changed
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 14:09:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150505120946.GL21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430826968-10251-1-git-send-email-xlpang@126.com>
On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 07:56:07PM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -4773,6 +4773,9 @@ void do_set_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, const struct cpumask *new_mask)
>
> cpumask_copy(&p->cpus_allowed, new_mask);
> p->nr_cpus_allowed = cpumask_weight(new_mask);
> +
> + if (p->sched_class->post_set_cpus_allowed)
> + p->sched_class->post_set_cpus_allowed(p);
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> index 8885b65..4176f33 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> @@ -2280,6 +2280,20 @@ static void set_cpus_allowed_rt(struct task_struct *p,
> update_rt_migration(&rq->rt);
> }
>
> +static void post_set_cpus_allowed_rt(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + struct rq *rq;
> +
> + if (!task_on_rq_queued(p))
> + return;
> +
> + rq = task_rq(p);
> + if (!task_running(rq, p) &&
> + p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1 &&
> + !test_tsk_need_resched(rq->curr))
> + push_rt_tasks(rq);
> +}
Guys, this is disgusting. Please don't do these minimal effort hacks.
Either fix up all the classes with a trivial set_cpus_allowed() function
and make do_set_cpus_allowed() := p->sched_class->set_cpus_allowed().
Or just do the p->{nr_,}cpus_allowed assignments in
set_cpus_allowed_rt() and keep it all in the one callback.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-05 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-05 11:56 [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/rt: Check to push task away when its affinity is changed Xunlei Pang
2015-05-05 11:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/rt: Remove redundant conditions from task_woken_rt() Xunlei Pang
2015-05-05 12:09 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
[not found] ` <OF0AFAEB82.B1AB4A37-ON48257E3C.0052FA35-48257E3C.00540890@zte.com.cn>
2015-05-08 17:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/rt: Check to push task away when its affinity is changed Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150505120946.GL21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pang.xunlei@linaro.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=xlpang@126.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox