public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mhocko@suse.cz
Subject: running hrtimer_start on an already active hrtimer?
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 15:30:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150505133054.GA20643@midget.suse.cz> (raw)

Hi,


I came across a strange bug (in a very old kernel) that triggers
the
	BUG_ON(timer->state != HRTIMER_STATE_CALLBACK);
in __run_hrtimer().

The code runs hrtimer_start() on an already started hrtimer. 
Looking at the description of hrtimer_start() it looks
like something that is allowed:
	/**
	 * hrtimer_start - (re)start an hrtimer on the current CPU
	...
	 * Returns:
	 *  0 on success
	 *  1 when the timer was active

Is this really supposed to work?

I think it's not immune to this race condition:

CPU0						CPU1
__run_hrtimer()
   __remove_hrtimer(...HRTIMER_STATE_CALLBACK)
      //clears HRTIMER_STATE_ENQUEUED
   ...
   raw_spin_unlock(&cpu_base->lock);
   restart = fn(timer);
						hrtimer_start()
						   __hrtimer_start_range_ns()
						      //remove_hrtimer() does nothing because
						      //  HRTIMER_STATE_ENQUEUED is not set
						      enqueue_hrtimer()
   raw_spin_lock(&cpu_base->lock);
   ...
   BUG_ON(timer->state != HRTIMER_STATE_CALLBACK);
   // state has HRTIMER_STATE_ENQUEUED set
   


Should __hrtimer_start_range_ns() do something like
hrtimer_cancel - i.e. explicitly check for ...
HRTIMER_STATE_CALLBACK?


Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, SUSE CZ


             reply	other threads:[~2015-05-05 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-05 13:30 Jiri Bohac [this message]
2015-05-05 15:11 ` running hrtimer_start on an already active hrtimer? Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150505133054.GA20643@midget.suse.cz \
    --to=jbohac@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox