linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] sched/deadline: fix try to pull pinned dl tasks in pull algorithm
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 15:11:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150506071138.GA2418@kernel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150427094238.GA4649@kernel>

Ping, :)
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 05:42:38PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>How about patch 1/7? :)
>On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 04:53:13PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>>Function pick_next_earliest_dl_task is used to pick earliest and pushable
>>dl task from overloaded cpus in pull algorithm, however, it traverses
>>runqueue rbtree instead of pushable task rbtree which is also ordered by
>>tasks' deadlines. This will result in getting no candidates from overloaded
>>cpus if all the dl tasks on the overloaded cpus are pinned. This patch fix
>>it by traversing pushable task rbtree which is also ordered by tasks'
>>deadlines.
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
>>---
>> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>>index 5e95145..b57ceba 100644
>>--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>>+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
>>@@ -1230,6 +1230,33 @@ next_node:
>> 	return NULL;
>> }
>> 
>>+/*
>>+ * Return the earliest pushable rq's task, which is suitable to be executed
>>+ * on the cpu, NULL otherwse
>>+ */
>>+static struct task_struct *pick_earliest_pushable_dl_task(struct rq *rq,
>>+									int cpu)
>>+{
>>+	struct rb_node *next_node = rq->dl.pushable_dl_tasks_leftmost;
>>+	struct task_struct *p = NULL;
>>+
>>+	if (!has_pushable_dl_tasks(rq))
>>+		return NULL;
>>+
>>+next_node:
>>+	if (next_node) {
>>+		p = rb_entry(next_node, struct task_struct, pushable_dl_tasks);
>>+
>>+		if (pick_dl_task(rq, p, cpu))
>>+			return p;
>>+
>>+		next_node = rb_next(next_node);
>>+		goto next_node;
>>+	}
>>+
>>+	return NULL;
>>+}
>>+
>> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, local_cpu_mask_dl);
>> 
>> static int find_later_rq(struct task_struct *task)
>>@@ -1514,7 +1541,7 @@ static int pull_dl_task(struct rq *this_rq)
>> 		if (src_rq->dl.dl_nr_running <= 1)
>> 			goto skip;
>> 
>>-		p = pick_next_earliest_dl_task(src_rq, this_cpu);
>>+		p = pick_earliest_pushable_dl_task(src_rq, this_cpu);
>> 
>> 		/*
>> 		 * We found a task to be pulled if:
>>-- 
>>1.9.1

      reply	other threads:[~2015-05-06  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-06  8:53 [PATCH 1/7] sched/deadline: fix try to pull pinned dl tasks in pull algorithm Wanpeng Li
2015-04-06  8:53 ` [PATCH 2/7] sched/deadline: make init_sched_dl_class() __init Wanpeng Li
2015-04-07 13:48   ` Juri Lelli
2015-04-07 23:00     ` Wanpeng Li
2015-04-06  8:53 ` [PATCH 3/7] sched/deadline: reduce rq lock contention by eliminating locking of non-feasible target Wanpeng Li
2015-04-07 13:48   ` Juri Lelli
2015-04-07 22:57     ` Wanpeng Li
2015-04-06  8:53 ` [PATCH 4/7] sched/deadline: reschedule if stop task slip in after pull operations Wanpeng Li
2015-04-20 10:27   ` Juri Lelli
2015-04-20 22:59     ` Wanpeng Li
2015-04-20 23:02       ` Wanpeng Li
2015-04-21  8:22         ` Juri Lelli
2015-04-06  8:53 ` [PATCH 5/7] sched/deadline: drop duplicate init_sched_dl_class declaration Wanpeng Li
2015-04-08  8:47   ` Juri Lelli
2015-04-08  8:33     ` Wanpeng Li
2015-04-06  8:53 ` [PATCH 6/7] sched/deadline: depend on clearing throttled status in replenish_dl_entity Wanpeng Li
2015-04-21  8:16   ` Juri Lelli
2015-04-21  8:10     ` Wanpeng Li
2015-04-06  8:53 ` [PATCH 7/7] sched/rt: reschedule if stop/dl task slip in after pull operations Wanpeng Li
2015-04-14 23:10 ` [PATCH 1/7] sched/deadline: fix try to pull pinned dl tasks in pull algorithm Wanpeng Li
2015-04-27  9:42 ` Wanpeng Li
2015-05-06  7:11   ` Wanpeng Li [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150506071138.GA2418@kernel \
    --to=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).