Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] mtrr, mm, x86: Enhance MTRR checks for KVA huge page mapping

Toshi Kani
2015-05-20T14:53:41Z

On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 13:55 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
>
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> > @@ -566,19 +566,28 @@ void native_set_fixmap(enum fixed_addresses idx, phys_addr_t phys,
> > /**
> > * pud_set_huge - setup kernel PUD mapping
> > *
> > - * MTRR can override PAT memory types with 4KiB granularity. Therefore,
> > - * this function does not set up a huge page when the range is covered
> > - * by a non-WB type of MTRR. MTRR_TYPE_INVALID indicates that MTRR are
> > - * disabled.
> > + * MTRRs can override PAT memory types with 4KiB granularity. Therefore, this
> > + * function sets up a huge page only if any of the following conditions are met:
> > + *
> > + * - MTRRs are disabled, or
> > + *
> > + * - MTRRs are enabled and the range is completely covered by a single MTRR, or
> > + *
> > + * - MTRRs are enabled and the range is not completely covered by a single MTRR
> > + * but the memory type of the range is WB, even if covered by multiple MTRRs.
> > + *
> > + * Callers should try to decrease page size (1GB -> 2MB -> 4K) if the bigger
> > + * page mapping attempt fails.
>
> This comment should explain why it's ok in the WB case.
>
> Also, the phrase 'the memory type of the range' is ambiguous: it might
> mean the partial MTRR's, or the memory type specified via PAT by the
> huge-pmd entry.

Agreed. How about this sentence?

- MTRRs are enabled and the corresponding MTRR memory type is WB, which
has no effect to the requested PAT memory type.

Thanks,
-Toshi