From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas@free-electrons.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris@free-electrons.com>
Subject: Possible RAID6 regression with ASYNC_TX_DMA enabled in 4.1
Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 14:57:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150507125702.GI11057@lukather> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1318 bytes --]
Hi,
I'm currently trying to add support for the PQ operations on the
marvell XOR engine, in dmaengine, obviously to be able to use async_tx
to offload these operations.
I'm testing these patches with a RAID6 array with 4 disks.
However, since the commit 59fc630b8b5f ("RAID5: batch adjacent full
stripe write", every write to that array fails with the following
stacktrace.
http://code.bulix.org/eh8iew-88342?raw
It seems to be generated by that warning here:
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/crypto/async_tx/async_tx.c#L173
And indeed, if we dump the status of depend_tx here, it's already been
acked.
That doesn't happen if ASYNC_TX_DMA is disabled, hence using the
software version of it, instead of relying on our XOR engine. It
doesn't happen on any commit prior to the one mentionned above, with
the exact same changes applied. These changes are meant to be
contributed, so I can definitely push them somewhere if needed.
I don't really know where to look for though, the change that is
causing this is probably the change in ops_run_reconstruct6, but I'm
not sure that this partial revert alone would work with regard to the
rest of the patch.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2015-05-07 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-07 12:57 Maxime Ripard [this message]
2015-05-07 14:39 ` AW: Possible RAID6 regression with ASYNC_TX_DMA enabled in 4.1 Markus Stockhausen
2015-05-11 9:13 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-05-11 6:26 ` Shaohua Li
2015-05-12 12:55 ` Maxime Ripard
2015-05-12 10:59 ` Shaohua Li
2015-05-13 7:46 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150507125702.GI11057@lukather \
--to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=alior@marvell.com \
--cc=boris@free-electrons.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=shli@fusionio.com \
--cc=thomas@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox