From: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
To: dave@sr71.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/12] [RFC] x86: Memory Protection Keys
Date: Thu, 07 May 2015 10:41:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150507174132.34AF8FAF@viggo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
This is a big, fat RFC. This code is going to be unrunable to
anyone outside of Intel. But, this patch set has user interface
implications because we need to pass the protection key in to
the kernel somehow.
At this point, I would especially appreciate feedback on how
we should do that. I've taken the most expedient approach for
this first attempt, especially since we piggyback on existing
syscalls here.
There is a lot of work left to do here. Mainly, we need to
ensure that when we are walking the page tables in software
that we obey protection keys when at all possible. This is
going to mean a lot of audits of the page table walking code,
although some of it like access_process_vm() we can probably
safely ignore.
This set is also available here:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/daveh/x86-pkeys.git pkeys-v001
== FEATURE OVERVIEW ==
Memory Protection Keys for Userspace (PKU aka PKEYs) is a CPU
feature which will be found in future Intel CPUs. The work here
was done with the aid of simulators.
Memory Protection Keys provides a mechanism for enforcing
page-based protections, but without requiring modification of the
page tables when an application changes protection domains. It
works by dedicating 4 previously ignored bits in each page table
entry to a "protection key", giving 16 possible keys.
There is also a new user-accessible register (PKRU) with two
separate bits (Access Disable and Write Disable) for each key.
Being a CPU register, PKRU is inherently thread-local,
potentially giving each thread a different set of protections
from every other thread.
There are two new instructions (RDPKRU/WRPKRU) for reading and
writing to the new register. The feature is only available in
64-bit mode, even though there is theoretically space in the PAE
PTEs. These permissions are enforced on data access only and
have no effect on instruction fetches.
next reply other threads:[~2015-05-07 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-07 17:41 Dave Hansen [this message]
2015-05-07 17:41 ` [PATCH 01/12] x86, pkeys: cpuid bit definition Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 17:41 ` [PATCH 02/12] x86, pku: define new CR4 bit Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 17:41 ` [PATCH 05/12] x86, pkeys: new page fault error code bit: PF_PK Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 17:41 ` [PATCH 03/12] x86, pkey: pkru xsave fields and data structure Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 17:41 ` [PATCH 04/12] x86, pkeys: PTE bits Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 17:41 ` [PATCH 06/12] x86, pkeys: store protection in high VMA flags Dave Hansen
2015-05-15 21:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-05-15 21:13 ` Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 17:41 ` [PATCH 07/12] mm: Pass the 4-bit protection key in via PROT_ bits to syscalls Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 19:11 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2015-05-07 19:19 ` Dave Hansen
2015-09-04 20:13 ` Florian Weimer
2015-09-04 20:18 ` Dave Hansen
2015-09-04 20:34 ` Florian Weimer
2015-09-04 20:41 ` Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 17:41 ` [PATCH 08/12] x86, pkeys: arch-specific protection bits Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 17:41 ` [PATCH 10/12] x86, pkeys: differentiate Protection Key faults from normal Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 17:41 ` [PATCH 09/12] x86, pkeys: notify userspace about protection key faults Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 17:41 ` [PATCH 11/12] x86, pkeys: actually enable Memory Protection Keys in CPU Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 17:41 ` [PATCH 12/12] x86, pkeys: Documentation Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 17:57 ` [PATCH 00/12] [RFC] x86: Memory Protection Keys Ingo Molnar
2015-05-07 18:09 ` Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 18:48 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-05-07 21:45 ` Dave Hansen
2015-05-09 19:09 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-05-07 19:18 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2015-05-07 19:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-07 19:40 ` Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 20:11 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2015-05-08 4:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-08 6:09 ` Kevin Easton
2015-05-07 19:22 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-05-07 19:29 ` Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 19:45 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-05-07 19:49 ` Dave Hansen
2015-05-07 19:57 ` Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150507174132.34AF8FAF@viggo.jf.intel.com \
--to=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox