From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752412AbbEJKoP (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2015 06:44:15 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174]:36190 "EHLO mail-wi0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752199AbbEJKoM (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2015 06:44:12 -0400 Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 12:44:07 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Len Brown Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 v3] speed up cpu_up() Message-ID: <20150510104407.GA24027@gmail.com> References: <1431107287-22022-1-git-send-email-lenb@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1431107287-22022-1-git-send-email-lenb@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Len Brown wrote: > Thanks for the feedback, here is a simplifed pair of patches. > > I also like the x2apic optimization, since it addresses additional delays. > -- though we may be able to optimize those in the non-x2apic case too. > > thanks, > Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center Could you please send it against tip:master, so that it applies cleanly to the x2apic optimization which is already applied? Thanks, Ingo