From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, jolsa@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
wangnan0@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] perf probe: Show better error message when failed to find variable
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 10:35:27 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150511133527.GB28183@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55509A67.1040704@hitachi.com>
Em Mon, May 11, 2015 at 09:02:47PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
> On 2015/05/11 19:15, He Kuang wrote:
> > On 2015/5/11 17:50, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> * He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com> wrote:
> >>> On 2015/5/11 17:30, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >>>>> After this patch:
> >>>>> $ perf probe --add 'generic_perform_write+118 bytes'
> >>>>> Failed to find the location of bytes at this address.
> >>>> What does this sentence mean? I thought 'address' means 'location of
> >>>> bytes'. So the address identifies the location and obviously we know
> >>>> that. So this message wants to say something else.
> >>> 'generic_perform_write' is a function name, while 'bytes' is a local
> >>> variable in this function. Maybe the variable I chose make you confused.
> >>> This maybe clear:
> >>> Failed to find the location of 'bytes' at this address.
> >> Yeah, absolutely! This highlights the importance of putting
> >> user-supplied symbols into quotes and such.
> >> Maybe even write:
> >> Failed to find the location of the 'bytes' variable at this address.
> OK, He, could you also include this fix?
I agree with the change, makes things clearer, will do the change
myself. If He has any objection to that, I can fix things up before
pushing it to Ingo,
Thanks,
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-11 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-11 9:25 [PATCH v3 1/3] perf probe: Remove length limitation for showing available variables He Kuang
2015-05-11 9:25 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] perf probe: Add --range option to show variable location range He Kuang
2015-05-11 12:04 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-05-15 6:44 ` [tip:perf/core] perf probe: Add --range option to show a variable 's " tip-bot for He Kuang
2015-05-11 9:25 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] perf probe: Show better error message when failed to find variable He Kuang
2015-05-11 9:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-11 9:43 ` He Kuang
2015-05-11 9:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-11 10:15 ` He Kuang
2015-05-11 12:02 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-05-11 13:35 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2015-05-11 13:44 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-05-11 20:31 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2015-05-11 9:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-15 6:44 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for He Kuang
2015-05-15 6:43 ` [tip:perf/core] perf probe: Remove length limitation for showing available variables tip-bot for He Kuang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150511133527.GB28183@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=hekuang@huawei.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox