public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: doug.hatch@hp.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org,
	Waiman.Long@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	scott.norton@hp.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	hpa@zytor.com
Cc: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:locking/core] locking/pvqspinlock: Replace xchg() by the more descriptive set_mb()
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 16:54:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150511145408.GU27504@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tip-52c9d2badd1ae4d11c29de57d4e964e48afd3cb4@git.kernel.org>

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 05:43:55AM -0700, tip-bot for Waiman Long wrote:
> -		(void)xchg(&pn->state, vcpu_halted);
> +		set_mb(pn->state, vcpu_halted);

Hmm, so I looked at the set_mb() definitions and I figure we want to do
something like the below, right?

---
 arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h      | 2 +-
 arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h    | 2 +-
 arch/ia64/include/asm/barrier.h     | 2 +-
 arch/metag/include/asm/barrier.h    | 2 +-
 arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h     | 2 +-
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h  | 2 +-
 arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h     | 2 +-
 arch/sparc/include/asm/barrier_64.h | 2 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h      | 2 +-
 include/asm-generic/barrier.h       | 2 +-
 10 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h
index d2f81e6b8c1c..993150aea681 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ do {									\
 #define read_barrier_depends()		do { } while(0)
 #define smp_read_barrier_depends()	do { } while(0)
 
-#define set_mb(var, value)	do { var = value; smp_mb(); } while (0)
+#define set_mb(var, value)	do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); smp_mb(); } while (0)
 
 #define smp_mb__before_atomic()	smp_mb()
 #define smp_mb__after_atomic()	smp_mb()
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
index 71f19c4dc0de..ff7de78d01b8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ do {									\
 #define read_barrier_depends()		do { } while(0)
 #define smp_read_barrier_depends()	do { } while(0)
 
-#define set_mb(var, value)	do { var = value; smp_mb(); } while (0)
+#define set_mb(var, value)	do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); smp_mb(); } while (0)
 #define nop()		asm volatile("nop");
 
 #define smp_mb__before_atomic()	smp_mb()
diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/barrier.h
index f6769eb2bbf9..03117e7b2ab8 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ do {									\
  * acquire vs release semantics but we can't discuss this stuff with
  * Linus just yet.  Grrr...
  */
-#define set_mb(var, value)	do { (var) = (value); mb(); } while (0)
+#define set_mb(var, value)	do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); mb(); } while (0)
 
 /*
  * The group barrier in front of the rsm & ssm are necessary to ensure
diff --git a/arch/metag/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/metag/include/asm/barrier.h
index d703d8e26a65..97eb018a2933 100644
--- a/arch/metag/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/arch/metag/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ static inline void fence(void)
 #define read_barrier_depends()		do { } while (0)
 #define smp_read_barrier_depends()	do { } while (0)
 
-#define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; smp_mb(); } while (0)
+#define set_mb(var, value) do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); smp_mb(); } while (0)
 
 #define smp_store_release(p, v)						\
 do {									\
diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h
index 2b8bbbcb9be0..cff1bbdaa74a 100644
--- a/arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@
 #endif
 
 #define set_mb(var, value) \
-	do { var = value; smp_mb(); } while (0)
+	do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); smp_mb(); } while (0)
 
 #define smp_llsc_mb()	__asm__ __volatile__(__WEAK_LLSC_MB : : :"memory")
 
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h
index a3bf5be111ff..2a072e48780d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
 #define rmb()  __asm__ __volatile__ ("sync" : : : "memory")
 #define wmb()  __asm__ __volatile__ ("sync" : : : "memory")
 
-#define set_mb(var, value)	do { var = value; mb(); } while (0)
+#define set_mb(var, value)	do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); mb(); } while (0)
 
 #ifdef __SUBARCH_HAS_LWSYNC
 #    define SMPWMB      LWSYNC
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
index 8d724718ec21..b66cd53d35fc 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
 #define smp_mb__before_atomic()		smp_mb()
 #define smp_mb__after_atomic()		smp_mb()
 
-#define set_mb(var, value)		do { var = value; mb(); } while (0)
+#define set_mb(var, value)		do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); mb(); } while (0)
 
 #define smp_store_release(p, v)						\
 do {									\
diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/barrier_64.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/barrier_64.h
index 76648941fea7..125fec7512f4 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/barrier_64.h
+++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/barrier_64.h
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ do {	__asm__ __volatile__("ba,pt	%%xcc, 1f\n\t" \
 #define dma_wmb()	wmb()
 
 #define set_mb(__var, __value) \
-	do { __var = __value; membar_safe("#StoreLoad"); } while(0)
+	do { WRITE_ONCE(__var, __value); membar_safe("#StoreLoad"); } while(0)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 #define smp_mb()	mb()
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
index 959e45b81fe2..9de5cde133a1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/barrier.h
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
 #define smp_mb()	barrier()
 #define smp_rmb()	barrier()
 #define smp_wmb()	barrier()
-#define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; barrier(); } while (0)
+#define set_mb(var, value) do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); barrier(); } while (0)
 #endif /* SMP */
 
 #define read_barrier_depends()		do { } while (0)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
index f5c40b0fadc2..3938716b44d7 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
 #endif
 
 #ifndef set_mb
-#define set_mb(var, value)  do { (var) = (value); mb(); } while (0)
+#define set_mb(var, value)  do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); mb(); } while (0)
 #endif
 
 #ifndef smp_mb__before_atomic

       reply	other threads:[~2015-05-11 14:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <tip-52c9d2badd1ae4d11c29de57d4e964e48afd3cb4@git.kernel.org>
2015-05-11 14:54 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-05-11 16:50   ` [tip:locking/core] locking/pvqspinlock: Replace xchg() by the more descriptive set_mb() Waiman Long
2015-05-11 17:50   ` Linus Torvalds
2015-05-12  8:45     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-12 13:00       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-12  8:53     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-12 14:59   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150511145408.GU27504@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
    --cc=doug.hatch@hp.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox