From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@coreos.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, mingo@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@coreos.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] x86: Allow built-in command line to work in early kernel init
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 11:28:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150512092821.GA10900@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPeXnHuG6k3seK9HPYYPt=MfDt2jN2mdUhMLYye9kdZPJE-4Jg@mail.gmail.com>
* Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@coreos.com> wrote:
> Any feedback on this?
So I worry about:
- the fragmented nature of it: lots of non-obvious pieces of code
will now be scattered all around arch/x86/.
- the crazy #ifdefs scattered around
- the various pieces of data scattered around
... so while I don't mind the feature in principle, but it should be
centralized much better IMHO, made Kconfig invariant at least in its
fragmented callbacks, with only the very strictly boot method specific
details spelled out explicitly.
I have not thought much about how to achieve that :-/
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-12 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-08 18:41 [PATCH] x86: Allow built-in command line to work in early kernel init Matthew Garrett
2015-04-09 20:25 ` [PATCH V2] " Matthew Garrett
2015-05-11 20:20 ` Matthew Garrett
2015-05-12 9:28 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-05-12 17:39 ` Matthew Garrett
2015-05-12 18:42 ` Matthew Garrett
2015-05-12 23:41 ` Yinghai Lu
2015-05-12 23:53 ` Matthew Garrett
2015-05-13 2:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-05-13 3:06 ` Matthew Garrett
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-05-19 23:09 Matthew Garrett
2015-05-20 7:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-05-27 23:33 ` Matthew Garrett
2015-06-03 9:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-06-03 16:08 ` Matthew Garrett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150512092821.GA10900@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.garrett@coreos.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mjg59@coreos.com \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox