public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
To: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Martin Sperl <kernel@martin.sperl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: Add option to bind spidev to all chipselects
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 12:16:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150513101625.GY10961@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150513093441.80359.qmail@dec59.ruk.cuni.cz>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1545 bytes --]

Hi,

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 09:34:41AM -0000, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Bypass the check if CS is in use for spidev devices if CONFIG_SPIDEV_SHADOW is
> set.  Rename spidev devices to avoid sysfs conflict.
> 
> This allows dynamically loading SPI device overlays or communicating
> with SPI devices configured by a kernel driver from userspace.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>

Output from checkpatch:
total: 2 errors, 4 warnings, 4 checks, 157 lines checked

...

I told you a few times already to run checkpatch before sending your
patches, apparently you make a point at ignoring me. Fine.

That being said, I'm not sure this is the right approach, or at least,
it doesn't solve anything. If SPIDEV_SHADOW is not set, you will still
have the same issue with addition of new devices on previously unused
chip selects, and where we have an spidev device now.

What I think we should do is, when a new device is created, we just
lookup the modalias of the spi_device associated to it.

If that modalias is "spidev", then unregister the spidev device,
register the new device, you're done. If not, return an error.

On the SPIDEV_SHADOW stuff itself, I'm not sure this is such a good
idea. There's a good chance it will break the driver by doing stuff
behind its back, possibly in a way that will harm the whole kernel,
and it's something we usually try to avoid.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-13 10:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-12 20:33 [PATCH] spi: Force the registration of the spidev devices Maxime Ripard
2015-05-13  9:34 ` [PATCH] spi: Add option to bind spidev to all chipselects Michal Suchanek
2015-05-13 10:16   ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2015-05-13 10:40     ` Michal Suchanek
2015-05-13 11:05   ` Mark Brown
2015-05-13 11:26 ` [PATCH] spi: Force the registration of the spidev devices Mark Brown
2015-05-13 12:35   ` Michal Suchanek
2015-05-13 12:51   ` Maxime Ripard
2015-05-13 14:36     ` Mark Brown
2015-05-13 15:31       ` Michal Suchanek
2015-05-13 17:43         ` Mark Brown
2015-05-13 19:09       ` Maxime Ripard
2015-05-13 19:10     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-05-13 19:41       ` Maxime Ripard
2015-05-13 15:37   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-05-13 15:52     ` Michal Suchanek
2015-05-13 17:13     ` Mark Brown
2015-05-13 17:20       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-05-13 17:39         ` Mark Brown
2015-05-13 18:16           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-05-13 18:32             ` Mark Brown
2015-05-13 18:36               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-05-13 18:51                 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-13 19:17                   ` Maxime Ripard
2015-05-13 17:50     ` Maxime Ripard
2015-05-13 18:12       ` Mark Brown
2015-05-13 18:17       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-05-13 19:23         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-05-13 19:26         ` Maxime Ripard
2015-05-13 22:33           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-05-14 14:34             ` Mark Brown
2015-05-15  8:09             ` Maxime Ripard
2015-07-15  6:27             ` Lucas De Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150513101625.GY10961@lukather \
    --to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=hramrach@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@martin.sperl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox