Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] clk: improve handling of orphan clocks

Stephen Boyd
2015-08-11T22:34:13Z

On 07/30, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:57:33AM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> >
> > did this lead anywhere meanwhile.
> >
> > Last I remember the change to orphan handling made sunxi fail, but
> > I'm still hoping to get this usable at some point :-)
>
> To be honest, I don't know what the current status is. I haven't get
> any news since that mail.
>
> I started to move a significant portion of our clocks to
> CLK_OF_DECLARE, but not all of them are (which probably make the
> situation worse for the time being).
>

Sorry, I think we're still waiting for the critical clocks stuff
to settle down so that Sunxi can use that instead of calling
clk_prepare_enable() in init code. For now, I've put the first
patch of the two into clk-next so that we can have proper orphan
tracking. Hopefully we resolve critical clocks soon so that we
can merge the defer part.

--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project