public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Support Opensource <support.opensource@diasemi.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	Milo Kim <milo.kim@ti.com>,
	patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: da9052: fix broken regulator probe
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 10:10:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150518091049.GN22418@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150515144739.GC13976@localhost>

On Fri, 15 May 2015, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 08:19:43AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 May 2015, Mark Brown wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 05:54:19PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 13 May 2015, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > If you're looking for me to review something you need to send it to me,
> > > > > and the chances of me looking at it are very much increased if there's a
> > > > > relevant subject line.  I'm CCed (not even on the to list) on endless
> > > > > large threads and reposts of patch serieses about MFD drivers most of
> > > > > which are of very little relevance to me so they get ignored very
> > > > > easily.
> > > 
> > > > Calm down dear, it's only a commercial.
> > > 
> > > > I wasn't having a pop.  Rather empathising with your situation and
> > > > facilitating a resend that you're likely to see.
> > > 
> > > > I'm sure Johan will do the right thing.
> > > 
> > > My point is that a simple resend has a reasonable chance of getting
> > > dropped on the floor.
> > 
> > As I say, I'm sure Johan will do what's required for that not to
> > happen.
> 
> Seriously? *Me* do the right thing?

Yes, *you*.  If a patch slips though a Maintainer's net, which does
happen every so often [*], I'm sure even you are not infallible to
that, a submitter must issue a RESEND (as you have now just done so).

> We have a regression in your subsystems (mfd/regulator) with a fix
> that's been sitting in both your mailboxes since March 25th.

Fully aware and ready to apply once the correct process has been
carried out.  I get shirty when people submit MFD patches without
permission, and I refuse to be a hypocrite.

> And now that Mark finally responds to a mail after repeated reminders
> from both me and Lee, he still doesn't care enough to look up the
> original mail or at least make sure that a resend does not get lost
> again.

See [*] about how Mark deals with his torrent of daily mail.

> You two even work for the same organisation. 

Irrelevant.

> Just pick up the phone or
> find a way to get a message across that mail filter instead of wasting
> everyone else's time.
> 
> I have resent the patch now. Please make sure it gets applied.

[*] Especially when you receive as much email as Mark does.  To cope
he has a brain-highpass-filter on the subject line and purges his
inbox regularly.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-18  9:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-20 19:23 [PATCH v2 0/5] mfd: Fix platform device ids to avoid probe failure Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-03-20 19:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mfd: max8997: " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-03-20 19:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mfd: da9055: " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-03-20 19:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mfd: lp8788: " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-03-20 19:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mfd: wm831x: " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-03-20 19:23 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mfd: da9052: Fix platform device names Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-03-23 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] mfd: Fix platform device ids to avoid probe failure Johan Hovold
2015-03-23 13:11   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-03-25 11:02     ` Johan Hovold
2015-03-25 11:07       ` [PATCH 1/2] mfd: da9052: fix broken regulator probe Johan Hovold
2015-03-25 11:07         ` [PATCH 2/2] mfd: core: fix platform-device name collisions Johan Hovold
2015-03-25 12:02           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-03-26  8:34           ` Lee Jones
2015-03-25 12:01         ` [PATCH 1/2] mfd: da9052: fix broken regulator probe Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-03-26  8:32         ` Lee Jones
2015-04-14 13:04           ` Johan Hovold
2015-04-29  7:44             ` Johan Hovold
2015-04-29  8:41               ` Lee Jones
2015-05-13 15:43                 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-13 16:08                   ` Mark Brown
2015-05-13 16:54                     ` Lee Jones
2015-05-13 17:29                       ` Mark Brown
2015-05-14  7:19                         ` Lee Jones
2015-05-15 14:47                           ` Johan Hovold
2015-05-18  9:10                             ` Lee Jones [this message]
2015-05-18  9:51                               ` Johan Hovold
2015-05-18 10:13                                 ` Lee Jones
2015-05-18 16:28                                   ` Mark Brown
2015-05-18 16:24                                 ` Mark Brown
2015-05-18 16:46                                   ` Johan Hovold
2015-05-18 18:46                                     ` Mark Brown
2015-05-19 10:01                                       ` Johan Hovold
2015-05-19 10:38                                         ` Mark Brown
2015-05-19 11:01                                           ` Johan Hovold
2015-05-19 12:01                                             ` Mark Brown
2015-05-15 14:27                   ` [PATCH RESEND] " Johan Hovold
2015-05-18 18:47                     ` Mark Brown
2015-05-18 18:57                     ` Lee Jones
2015-03-30  7:18         ` [PATCH 1/2] " Lee Jones
2015-03-25 12:04       ` [PATCH v2 0/5] mfd: Fix platform device ids to avoid probe failure Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150518091049.GN22418@x1 \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=milo.kim@ti.com \
    --cc=patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=support.opensource@diasemi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox