public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, "Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Asynchronous device/driver probing support
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 14:48:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150518214819.GE19708@dtor-ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150406174530.GA16070@kroah.com>

On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 07:45:30PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 09:22:51AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 04:39:49PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 04:20:02PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > This series is a combination of changes proposed by Luis a couple months
> > > > ago and implementation used by Chrome OS. The issue we are trying to solve
> > > > here is "slow" devices and drivers spending "too much time" in their probe()
> > > > methods and it affects:
> > > > 
> > > > - overall kernel boot process when drivers are compiled into the kernel
> > > >   and slow devices stall entire boot progress;
> > > > - systemd desire to time out module loading process.
> > > > 
> > > > Unlike Luis' proposal we do make use of asycn_schedule() infrastructure
> > > > instead of using a dedicated workqueue, so all  existing synchronization
> > > > points in kernel that wait for device registration still work the same.
> > > > Also, the asynchronous probing is done not only during driver registration
> > > > (i.e. when devices are probed asynchronously only if they are registered
> > > > before the driver), but also during device registration and deferred probe
> > > > handling. This way slow devices do not stall kernel boot even when drivers
> > > > are compiled into the kernel.
> > > > 
> > > > The last patch is for adventurous people to try and force
> > > > fully-asynchronous boot. It works for me with limited success - I can boot
> > > > Rockhip-based box to userspace as long as I force serial to be sychronously
> > > > probed and ignore the fact that most devices are using "dummy" regulators
> > > > as regulator subsystem really expects regulators to be registered in
> > > > orderly fashion on OF-based systems.
> > > > 
> > > > Changes from v1:
> > > > 
> > > > - Changed verbage in change logs and code to emphasise that
> > > >   PROBE_PREFER_ASYNCHRONOUS is a temporary measure and the end goal is
> > > >   to enable asynchronous probing by default, as requested by Tejun.
> > > 
> > > Looks good to me.  Please feel free to add
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> > 
> > Greg, it would be great if it could make it in 4.1.
> 
> It's on my list of patches to review next...

Greg, could we make 4.2 please? ;)

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-18 21:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-30 23:20 [PATCH v2 0/8] Asynchronous device/driver probing support Dmitry Torokhov
2015-03-30 23:20 ` [PATCH 1/8] module: add extra argument for parse_params() callback Dmitry Torokhov
2015-03-30 23:20 ` [PATCH 2/8] driver-core: add asynchronous probing support for drivers Dmitry Torokhov
2015-05-29 10:48   ` Tomeu Vizoso
2015-05-29 13:23     ` Tomeu Vizoso
2015-06-01 12:04       ` Tomeu Vizoso
2015-07-06 23:41         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2015-06-27 23:45   ` Dan Williams
2015-07-03 18:30     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-07-06 23:33     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2015-03-30 23:20 ` [PATCH 3/8] driver-core: add driver module asynchronous probe support Dmitry Torokhov
2015-03-30 23:20 ` [PATCH 4/8] driver-core: enable drivers to opt-out of async probe Dmitry Torokhov
2015-03-30 23:20 ` [PATCH 5/8] driver-core: platform_driver_probe() must probe synchronously Dmitry Torokhov
2015-03-30 23:20 ` [PATCH 6/8] amd64_edac: enforce synchronous probe Dmitry Torokhov
2015-03-30 23:20 ` [PATCH 7/8] module: add core_param_unsafe Dmitry Torokhov
2015-03-30 23:20 ` [PATCH 8/8] driver-core: allow enabling async probing for all modules and builtins Dmitry Torokhov
2015-05-20  7:27   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-05-20 16:44     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2015-05-21  4:34       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-05-21 19:02         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2015-03-31 20:39 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] Asynchronous device/driver probing support Tejun Heo
2015-04-06 16:22   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2015-04-06 17:45     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-05-18 21:48       ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2015-05-19  0:53         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150518214819.GE19708@dtor-ws \
    --to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@suse.com \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox