From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: perf: fuzzer triggers NULL pointer derefreence in x86_schedule_events
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 15:15:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150520131525.GG18673@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150520130312.GL3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 03:03:12PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> So new in this release is:
>
> static void intel_put_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
> struct perf_event *event)
> {
> ...
>
> /* cleanup dynamic constraint */
> if (c && (c->flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_DYNAMIC))
> event->hw.constraint = NULL;
> }
>
> Which is the only place that value is ever cleared...
>
> Now, I've not quite figured out how that can intersect with scheduling,
> typically we only call put_event_constraints() when we're done with the
> event.
Related to that; intel_commit_scheduling() has:
c = event->hw.constraint;
if (!c)
return;
Stephane, how can that ever be?
x86_schedule_events() does:
hwc->constraint = get_event_constraints()
for all events, and intel_get_event_constraints() will _always_ return a
valid constraint -- &unconstrained if nothing else.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-20 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-30 19:08 perf: fuzzer triggers NULL pointer derefreence in x86_schedule_events Vince Weaver
2015-05-01 12:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-04 19:32 ` Stephane Eranian
2015-05-07 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-08 4:25 ` Vince Weaver
2015-05-18 17:40 ` Vince Weaver
2015-05-20 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-20 13:15 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-05-20 13:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-20 15:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-20 16:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-05-24 19:14 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150520131525.GG18673@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox